Skip to content
Compare Spartans vs Forfar

Spartans vs Forfar Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Spartans vs Forfar: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Spartans Spartans Home Team
Forfar Forfar Away Team
Spartans
34.1
W L L L D L D D W L

Last 10 Matches

Forfar
40.1
W L L L L D W W W W

Performance Radar

Spartans
Forfar

Categories Won

3

Spartans

4

Draw

8

Forfar

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

50%

5W, 1D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-6

-6

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Stowe (3 goals)
S. Shepherd (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
39.6

League Difficulty: 39.8, Opponent Quality: 39.5

41.9

League Difficulty: 38.5, Opponent Quality: 44.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.93

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.17

1.13

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: +0.27

Adjusted Power Rating
34.1

Attack: 32.9, Defense: 38.8, Form: 17.9

40.1

Attack: 42.9, Defense: 30.6, Form: 46.0

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

2

16-30'

3
2

31-45'

3
3

46-60'

1

61-75'

2
2

76-90+'

4
Spartans
Forfar
Spartans

Power Rating Breakdown

34.1

Overall

Attack 32.9
Defense 38.8
Form 17.9
Consistency 61.3
Forfar

Power Rating Breakdown

40.1

Overall

Attack 42.9
Defense 30.6
Form 46.0
Consistency 38.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

39.8 vs 38.5

Opponent Quality

39.5 vs 44.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Spartans logo Spartans
W
Montrose (47%)
L
Dundee Utd (53%)
L
Stirling (38%)
L
Arbroath (42%)
D
Clyde (44%)
L
Clyde (49%)
D
Stirling (38%)
D
Elgin (23%)
Forfar logo Forfar
W
Brechin (36%)
L
Livingston (53%)
L
Partick (54%)
L
Hamilton (63%)
L
Hamilton (58%)
D
Annan (29%)
W
Edinburgh City (36%)
W
Stranraer (37%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Montrose A
2 - 0 W
47%
Dundee Utd A
0 - 4 L
53%
Stirling H
1 - 3 L
38%
Arbroath H
1 - 2 L
42%
Clyde H
1 - 1 D
44%
Clyde A
0 - 2 L
49%
Stirling A
2 - 2 D
38%
Elgin H
1 - 1 D
23%
Annan A
2 - 0 W
29%
Stranraer H
1 - 2 L
32%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Brechin H
3 - 1 W
36%
Livingston A
0 - 8 L
53%
Partick H
0 - 4 L
54%
Hamilton A
1 - 2 L
63%
Hamilton H
1 - 3 L
58%
Annan A
1 - 1 D
29%
Edinburgh City H
4 - 0 W
36%
Stranraer A
1 - 0 W
37%
East Kilbride H
1 - 0 W
52%
Elgin H
2 - 1 W
23%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (39.6 vs 41.9), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Spartans (1.1 goals per match) and Forfar (1.4 goals per match) present comparable offensive threats, making this an evenly contested attacking matchup.

Spartans's backline outperforms Forfar's, with 1.7 goals conceded per match versus 2.0.

Spartans has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Forfar has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.1 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: Spartans is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📈 Form Momentum: Forfar has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Forfar is on the rise with 5W in last 10, while Spartans shows signs of decline with 2W in last 10.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Forfar faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 2.0 goals per match. If Spartans can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 6.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 65% win probability for Forfar. In practical terms, Forfar would win 6 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward Forfar, with a 6.0-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Spartans

Spartans

VS
Forfar

Forfar

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Spartans

2W 3D 5L · 11 goals scored · 17 conceded

Forfar

5W 1D 4L · 14 goals scored · 20 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or