Skip to content
Compare Sporting KC vs Earthquakes

Sporting KC vs Earthquakes Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Sporting KC vs Earthquakes: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Sporting KC Sporting KC Home Team
Earthquakes Earthquakes Away Team
Sporting KC
34.4
L D L L L W L L W W

Last 10 Matches

Earthquakes
31.1
L L L L D L W L L D

Performance Radar

Sporting KC
Earthquakes

Categories Won

5

Sporting KC

4

Draw

6

Earthquakes

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 1D, 6L

10%

1W, 2D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

2.6

26 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-7

-7

-13

-13

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
D. Joveljić (3 goals)
P. Judd (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
41.1

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 54.6

53.1

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 51.8

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.12

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.08

1.26

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.04

Adjusted Power Rating
34.4

Attack: 36.4, Defense: 33.4, Form: 27.3

31.1

Attack: 44.7, Defense: 13.7, Form: 10.3

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

5
1

16-30'

3
2

31-45'

3

46-60'

2
3

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

1
Sporting KC
Earthquakes
Sporting KC

Power Rating Breakdown

34.4

Overall

Attack 36.4
Defense 33.4
Form 27.3
Consistency 46.0
Earthquakes

Power Rating Breakdown

31.1

Overall

Attack 44.7
Defense 13.7
Form 10.3
Consistency 74.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

54.6 vs 51.8

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Sporting KC logo Sporting KC
L
Atlanta United (49%)
D
St. Louis (68%)
L
Colorado (54%)
L
Houston (65%)
L
LAFC (58%)
W
Minnesota (45%)
L
St. Louis (72%)
L
New York (49%)
Earthquakes logo Earthquakes
L
Minnesota (45%)
L
Galaxy (49%)
L
St. Louis (68%)
L
Cincinnati (61%)
D
Galaxy (44%)
L
Orlando (49%)
W
Portland (58%)
L
Dallas (53%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Atlanta United A
1 - 2 L
49%
St. Louis H
1 - 1 D
68%
Colorado A
0 - 2 L
54%
Houston H
0 - 2 L
65%
LAFC A
0 - 4 L
58%
Minnesota H
2 - 1 W
45%
St. Louis A
2 - 3 L
72%
New York H
1 - 2 L
49%
Austin A
2 - 1 W
42%
Galaxy H
3 - 1 W
44%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Minnesota H
1 - 5 L
45%
Galaxy A
0 - 1 L
49%
St. Louis H
1 - 3 L
68%
Cincinnati A
2 - 4 L
61%
Galaxy H
1 - 1 D
44%
Orlando H
0 - 4 L
49%
Portland A
3 - 1 W
58%
Dallas H
2 - 3 L
53%
Sounders A
2 - 3 L
36%
Whitecaps H
1 - 1 D
55%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but when we adjust for opponent quality, the picture becomes even more intriguing. Both teams have earned their statistics against comparable opposition.

Context matters here: Earthquakes's schedule strength (SoS: 53.1) has been notably more demanding than Sporting KC's (SoS: 41.1), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Sporting KC averaging 1.2 and Earthquakes averaging 1.3 goals per match.

Sporting KC's backline outperforms Earthquakes's, with 1.9 goals conceded per match versus 2.6.

Earthquakes has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.5 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

❄️ Form Momentum: Earthquakes is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Sporting KC faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.9 goals per match. If Earthquakes can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: Earthquakes's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Sporting KC

Sporting KC

VS
Earthquakes

Earthquakes

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Sporting KC

3W 1D 6L · 12 goals scored · 19 conceded

Earthquakes

1W 2D 7L · 13 goals scored · 26 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or