Skip to content
Compare Stirling Unv vs Cowdenbeath

Stirling Unv vs Cowdenbeath Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Stirling Unv vs Cowdenbeath: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Stirling Unv Stirling Unv Home Team
Cowdenbeath Cowdenbeath Away Team
Stirling Unv
19.7
L L L L L L L D L L

Last 10 Matches

Cowdenbeath
37.0
W L L L W D W L L D

Performance Radar

Stirling Unv
Cowdenbeath

Categories Won

1

Stirling Unv

3

Draw

11

Cowdenbeath

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
0%

0W, 1D, 9L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
0.6

6 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
3.1

31 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-25

-25

-1

-1

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Vonk (1 goals)
R. Walker (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
34.7

League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 41.2

31.9

League Difficulty: 27.0, Opponent Quality: 35.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.59

Actual: 0.6 | Diff: +0.01

1.33

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.47

Adjusted Power Rating
19.7

Attack: 16.9, Defense: 0.0, Form: 0.0

37.0

Attack: 49.1, Defense: 30.0, Form: 24.6

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

3
1

31-45'

3
2

46-60'

3
1

61-75'

4
1

76-90+'

3
Stirling Unv
Cowdenbeath
Stirling Unv

Power Rating Breakdown

19.7

Overall

Attack 16.9
Defense 0.0
Form 0.0
Consistency 97.3
Cowdenbeath

Power Rating Breakdown

37.0

Overall

Attack 49.1
Defense 30.0
Form 24.6
Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

25.0 vs 27.0

Opponent Quality

41.2 vs 35.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Stirling Unv logo Stirling Unv
L
Cowdenbeath (39%)
L
Berwick (40%)
L
Tranent (50%)
L
East Stirling (35%)
L
Cumbernauld C. (43%)
L
Gala (26%)
L
Braves (43%)
D
Berwick (40%)
Cowdenbeath logo Cowdenbeath
W
Stirling Unv (12%)
L
Edinburgh City (56%)
L
Broxburn Ath. (33%)
L
Strollers (30%)
W
Hearts (24%)
D
Celtic (48%)
W
Strollers (25%)
L
Clydebank (58%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Cowdenbeath A
2 - 4 L
39%
Berwick A
2 - 3 L
40%
Tranent H
1 - 2 L
50%
East Stirling A
0 - 2 L
35%
Cumbernauld C. A
1 - 4 L
43%
Gala H
0 - 2 L
26%
Braves H
0 - 4 L
43%
Berwick A
0 - 0 D
40%
Albion A
0 - 5 L
46%
Tranent H
0 - 5 L
50%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Stirling Unv H
4 - 2 W
12%
Edinburgh City A
1 - 3 L
56%
Broxburn Ath. H
0 - 2 L
33%
Strollers A
2 - 3 L
30%
Hearts H
3 - 0 W
24%
Celtic A
2 - 2 D
48%
Strollers H
4 - 0 W
25%
Clydebank H
0 - 4 L
58%
Gretna A
1 - 2 L
22%
Bo'ness Utd A
1 - 1 D
43%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 34.7 vs 31.9), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

Cowdenbeath possess a formidable attacking unit, with R. Walker accounting for 4 goals and the squad maintaining an impressive 1.8 goals per game — a threat no opponent can afford to overlook.

Defensively, Cowdenbeath is far superior, conceding just 1.9 goals per match with 2 clean sheets, while Stirling Unv leaks 3.1 goals per match.

Stirling Unv has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Cowdenbeath has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 3.7 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at possible based on both sides' scoring records.

❄️ Form Momentum: Stirling Unv is struggling for form, winning just 0 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Cowdenbeath is on the rise with 3W in last 10, while Stirling Unv shows signs of decline with 0W in last 10.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Cowdenbeath faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.9 goals per match. If Stirling Unv can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 17.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Cowdenbeath. In practical terms, Cowdenbeath would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Based on the available data, Cowdenbeath holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 37.0 against 19.7 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.

In their recent Highland / Lowland match (2026-08-22), Cowdenbeath prevailed 4-2 against Stirling Unv. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Cowdenbeath secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. Stirling Unv will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Cowdenbeath will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Stirling Unv

Stirling Unv

VS
Cowdenbeath

Cowdenbeath

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Stirling Unv

0W 1D 9L · 6 goals scored · 31 conceded

Cowdenbeath

3W 2D 5L · 18 goals scored · 19 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or