Telstar vs Groningen Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Telstar vs Groningen: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Telstar
Home Team
Groningen
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Telstar
Draw
Groningen
Statistical Comparison
6W, 1D, 3L
3W, 2D, 5L
21 / 10 matches
10 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
16 / 10 matches
+7
-6
2 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
4W / 5 matches
1W / 6 matches
2W / 5 matches
2W / 4 matches
League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 58.3
League Difficulty: 69.5, Opponent Quality: 59.9
1W / 3 matches
2W / 4 matches
Actual: 2.1 | Diff: -0.27
Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.12
Attack: 77.5, Defense: 59.0, Form: 66.4
Attack: 37.1, Defense: 51.9, Form: 33.4
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Telstar
Groningen
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 60.7 vs 61.3), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Few sides can match Telstar in front of goal. Their 2.1 average per fixture tells the story, with S. van Duijn driving that output personally responsible for 4 goals this campaign.
Both defenses are comparable, with Telstar conceding 1.4 and Groningen conceding 1.6 per match.
Telstar has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Groningen has proven their mettle against elite opponents, winning 2 of 4 matches against top-tier teams. This is a crucial indicator of their ability to perform under pressure.
Telstar has an exceptional home record with a 80% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Statistical modeling projects 3.0 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.
📈 Form Momentum: Telstar has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.9 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Telstar is on the rise with 6W in last 10, while Groningen shows signs of decline with 3W in last 10.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Telstar faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If Groningen can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 22.9-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Telstar. In practical terms, Telstar would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Based on the available data, Telstar holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 64.4 against 41.5 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.
In their recent Dutch Eredivisie match (2026-04-04), Groningen prevailed 0-2 against Telstar. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, Groningen achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Telstar shows genuine quality and mental strength. Telstar will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Groningen will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Telstar
Groningen
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Telstar
6W 1D 3L · 21 goals scored · 14 conceded
Groningen
3W 2D 5L · 10 goals scored · 16 conceded
Popular Teams