Telstar vs Groningen Estadísticas Cara a Cara y Comparación de Forma
Compará Telstar vs Groningen: estadísticas mano a mano, forma reciente, goles, récord defensivo e indicadores de fuerza de los últimos partidos.
Telstar
Equipo Local
Groningen
Equipo Visitante
Comparar...
Radar de Rendimiento
Categorías Ganadas
Telstar
Empate
Groningen
Comparación Estadística
6V, 1E, 3D
3V, 2E, 5D
21 / 10 partidos
10 / 10 partidos
14 / 10 partidos
16 / 10 partidos
+7
-6
2 / 10 partidos
3 / 10 partidos
8 / 10 partidos
6 / 10 partidos
6 / 10 partidos
5 / 10 partidos
4V / 5 partidos
1V / 6 partidos
2V / 5 partidos
2V / 4 partidos
Dificultad de Liga: 80.0, Calidad del Rival: 58.3
Dificultad de Liga: 69.5, Calidad del Rival: 59.9
1V / 3 partidos
2V / 4 partidos
Real: 2.1 | Dif: -0.27
Real: 1.0 | Dif: -0.12
Ataque: 77.5, Defensa: 59.0, Forma: 66.4
Ataque: 37.1, Defensa: 51.9, Forma: 33.4
Análisis de Tiempos de Gol
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Desglose de Poder
General
Desglose de Poder
General
Dificultad del Calendario
Mide la dificultad de los rivales enfrentados. Mayor = calendario más difícil.
Dificultad de Liga
Calidad del Rival
Récord contra Élite
Telstar
Groningen
Calidad del Rival: La calidad combina la fuerza de la liga, la forma reciente por puntos, la diferencia de goles y el contexto local/visitante. No es solo tamaño o reputación del club.
Análisis IA
When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 60.7 vs 61.3), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Few sides can match Telstar in front of goal. Their 2.1 average per fixture tells the story, with S. van Duijn driving that output personally responsible for 4 goals this campaign.
Both defenses are comparable, with Telstar conceding 1.4 and Groningen conceding 1.6 per match.
Telstar has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Groningen has proven their mettle against elite opponents, winning 2 of 4 matches against top-tier teams. This is a crucial indicator of their ability to perform under pressure.
Telstar has an exceptional home record with a 80% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Statistical modeling projects 3.0 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.
📈 Form Momentum: Telstar has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.9 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Telstar is on the rise with 6W in last 10, while Groningen shows signs of decline with 3W in last 10.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Telstar faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If Groningen can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 22.9-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Telstar. In practical terms, Telstar would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Based on the available data, Telstar holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 64.4 against 41.5 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.
In their recent Dutch Eredivisie match (2026-04-04), Groningen prevailed 0-2 against Telstar. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, Groningen achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Telstar shows genuine quality and mental strength. Telstar will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Groningen will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Simulador de Partido
Simulación de partido con IA basada en estadísticas reales
Telstar
Groningen
En los enfrentamientos H2H (cara a cara), para eliminar las fluctuaciones momentáneas y las casualidades, limitamos nuestros análisis a una profundidad óptima de exactamente 10 partidos. Ni más, ni menos. Este enfoque preciso es nuestro estándar de oro indiscutible, que revela en su forma más pura la superioridad táctica y psicológica que un equipo ejerce sobre otro. No nos dejamos llevar por el ruido del pasado, sino que nos enfocamos en la precisión milimétrica de la forma actual.
Resumen de enfrentamientos directos
Esta comparación cara a cara analiza los últimos 10 partidos de cada equipo, evaluando la potencia ofensiva, la solidez defensiva, la consistencia del rendimiento y las métricas generales de rendimiento. Las calificaciones de poder se calculan mediante un algoritmo ponderado que considera los goles a favor, los goles en contra, el porcentaje de victorias y las tendencias recientes de forma.
Telstar
6W 1D 3L · 21 goles a favor · 14 goles en contra
Groningen
3W 2D 5L · 10 goles a favor · 16 goles en contra
Equipos Populares