Skip to content
Compare TNS vs Caernarfon

TNS vs Caernarfon Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare TNS vs Caernarfon: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

TNS TNS Home Team
Caernarfon Caernarfon Away Team
TNS
44.6
L L L W W W L W W L

Last 10 Matches

Caernarfon
38.4
L L W W W L L L W W

Performance Radar

TNS
Caernarfon

Categories Won

6

TNS

4

Draw

5

Caernarfon

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 0D, 5L

50%

5W, 0D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

2.1

21 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
0

0

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
R. Brobbel (3 goals)
B. Young (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
67%

4W / 6 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
44.6

League Difficulty: 58.7, Opponent Quality: 60.4

39.4

League Difficulty: 51.6, Opponent Quality: 53.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.14

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.06

1.31

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: +0.19

Adjusted Power Rating
44.6

Attack: 37.8, Defense: 56.8, Form: 47.3

38.4

Attack: 44.7, Defense: 26.8, Form: 44.7

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

4
1

16-30'

3
1

31-45'

2

46-60'

2

61-75'

3
6

76-90+'

3
TNS
Caernarfon
TNS

Power Rating Breakdown

44.6

Overall

Attack 37.8
Defense 56.8
Form 47.3
Consistency 32.5
Caernarfon

Power Rating Breakdown

38.4

Overall

Attack 44.7
Defense 26.8
Form 44.7
Consistency 32.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

58.7 vs 51.6

Opponent Quality

60.4 vs 53.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
TNS logo TNS
L
Flora (74%)
L
Sabah (95%)
L
Sabah (97%)
W
Barry Town (61%)
W
Connah's Quay Nomads (42%)
W
Caernarfon (48%)
L
Colwyn Bay (48%)
W
Penybont (36%)
Caernarfon logo Caernarfon
L
Levadia (82%)
L
Levadia (80%)
W
Penybont (31%)
W
Flint Town Utd (45%)
W
Colwyn Bay (52%)
L
TNS (46%)
L
Barry Town (61%)
L
Connah's Quay Nomads (42%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Flora A
0 - 1 L
74%
Sabah H
1 - 2 L
95%
Sabah A
0 - 2 L
97%
Barry Town A
1 - 0 W
61%
Connah's Quay Nomads H
2 - 1 W
42%
Caernarfon A
4 - 0 W
48%
Colwyn Bay H
0 - 2 L
48%
Penybont A
2 - 1 W
36%
Connah's Quay Nomads A
2 - 1 W
47%
Barry Town H
0 - 2 L
56%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Levadia A
0 - 5 L
82%
Levadia H
0 - 5 L
80%
Penybont H
2 - 0 W
31%
Flint Town Utd H
3 - 0 W
45%
Colwyn Bay A
2 - 0 W
52%
TNS H
0 - 4 L
46%
Barry Town A
1 - 2 L
61%
Connah's Quay Nomads H
2 - 4 L
42%
Y Rhyl 1879 A
2 - 1 W
49%
Colwyn Bay H
3 - 0 W
48%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 44.6 vs 39.4), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

Offensively, Caernarfon outperforms TNS with 1.5 goals per match to 1.2, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.

TNS holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 1.2 goals per game and recording 2 clean sheets, compared to Caernarfon's leaky backline that surrenders 2.1 goals per match.

TNS has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

TNS is a strong road performer with a 67% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.0 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking unlikely given current form.

📈 Form Momentum: TNS has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📈 Form Momentum: Caernarfon has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: The 6.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 66% win probability for TNS. In practical terms, TNS would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward TNS, with a 6.2-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

In their recent Cymru Premier match (2026-03-27), TNS prevailed 0-4 against Caernarfon. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, TNS achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Caernarfon shows genuine quality and mental strength. The 0-4 scoreline was emphatic — TNS completely dominated Caernarfon in that encounter, raising serious questions about Caernarfon's ability to compete at this level. Caernarfon will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. TNS will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

TNS

TNS

VS
Caernarfon

Caernarfon

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

TNS

5W 0D 5L · 12 goals scored · 12 conceded

Caernarfon

5W 0D 5L · 15 goals scored · 21 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or