Skip to content
Compare Thun vs St.Gallen

Thun vs St.Gallen Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Thun vs St.Gallen: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Thun Thun Home Team
St.Gallen St.Gallen Away Team
Thun
32.6
L L L W L L W D D L

Last 10 Matches

St.Gallen
52.3
L W D W W L W W L D

Performance Radar

Thun
St.Gallen

Categories Won

2

Thun

3

Draw

10

St.Gallen

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 2D, 6L

50%

5W, 2D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
3.4

34 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-17

-17

0

0

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
B. Labeau (5 goals)
A. Hunziker (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 13
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.1

League Difficulty: 72.4, Opponent Quality: 69.1

55.6

League Difficulty: 66.9, Opponent Quality: 58.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 4 matches

33%

1W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.02

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.32

2.12

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.32

Adjusted Power Rating
32.6

Attack: 58.4, Defense: 0.0, Form: 20.6

52.3

Attack: 63.4, Defense: 42.2, Form: 52.8

Goal Timing Analysis

5

0-15'

2
4

16-30'

1

31-45'

2
1

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

6
4

76-90+'

6
Thun
St.Gallen
Thun

Power Rating Breakdown

32.6

Overall

Attack 58.4
Defense 0.0
Form 20.6
Consistency 59.2
St.Gallen

Power Rating Breakdown

52.3

Overall

Attack 63.4
Defense 42.2
Form 52.8
Consistency 45.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

72.4 vs 66.9

Opponent Quality

69.1 vs 58.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 33%
Thun logo Thun
L
Lech (87%)
L
Víkingur R (70%)
L
Basel (49%)
W
Víkingur R (67%)
L
Young Boys (63%)
L
Dinamo Zagreb (90%)
W
Luzern (59%)
D
Dinamo Zagreb (85%)
St.Gallen logo St.Gallen
L
Nordsjælland (83%)
W
Sheriff (56%)
D
Luzern (54%)
W
Sheriff (59%)
W
Vaduz (52%)
L
Benfica (87%)
W
Zürich (35%)
W
Benfica (82%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Lech A
0 - 7 L
87%
Víkingur R A
2 - 3 L
70%
Basel A
2 - 4 L
49%
Víkingur R H
3 - 0 W
67%
Young Boys H
0 - 6 L
63%
Dinamo Zagreb A
2 - 3 L
90%
Luzern A
3 - 1 W
59%
Dinamo Zagreb H
1 - 1 D
85%
St.Gallen A
1 - 1 D
58%
Young Boys H
3 - 8 L
63%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Nordsjælland A
0 - 1 L
83%
Sheriff H
5 - 1 W
56%
Luzern H
2 - 2 D
54%
Sheriff A
3 - 1 W
59%
Vaduz A
3 - 2 W
52%
Benfica A
0 - 5 L
87%
Zürich H
2 - 1 W
35%
Benfica H
2 - 1 W
82%
Norwich H
0 - 3 L
45%
Thun H
1 - 1 D
34%

AI Analysis

Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 53.1 vs 55.6), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Thun averaging 1.7 and St.Gallen averaging 1.8 goals per match.

The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for St.Gallen — 1.8 goals conceded per game and 0 clean sheets put them well ahead of Thun, who give up 3.4 goals per match at the other end.

Thun has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

St.Gallen has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Statistical modeling projects 4.3 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

❄️ Form Momentum: Thun is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📈 Form Momentum: St.Gallen has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. St.Gallen is on the rise with 5W in last 10, while Thun shows signs of decline with 2W in last 10.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, St.Gallen faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.8 goals per match. If Thun can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 19.7-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for St.Gallen. In practical terms, St.Gallen would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Based on the available data, St.Gallen holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 52.3 against 32.6 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.

These two teams drew 1-1 in the Swiss Super League (2026-05-17). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Thun

Thun

VS
St.Gallen

St.Gallen

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Thun

2W 2D 6L · 17 goals scored · 34 conceded

St.Gallen

5W 2D 3L · 18 goals scored · 18 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or