Skip to content
Compare Tranent vs Cumbernauld C.

Tranent vs Cumbernauld C. Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Tranent vs Cumbernauld C.: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Tranent Tranent Home Team
Cumbernauld C. Cumbernauld C. Away Team
Tranent
53.4
W L D L D W W W W W

Last 10 Matches

Cumbernauld C.
59.9
W L W W D W W L W W

Performance Radar

Tranent
Cumbernauld C.

Categories Won

2

Tranent

4

Draw

9

Cumbernauld C.

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
60%

6W, 2D, 2L

70%

7W, 1D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

3.1

31 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.9

9 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+10

+10

+17

+17

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

100%

10 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
G. McGarry (5 goals)
T. Horn (7 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 14
1st Half: 12 / 2nd Half: 19
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

80%

4W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
33.7

League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 39.5

30.7

League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 34.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.31

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: +0.59

2.33

Actual: 3.1 | Diff: +0.77

Adjusted Power Rating
53.4

Attack: 53.0, Defense: 58.6, Form: 50.2

59.9

Attack: 80.7, Defense: 43.0, Form: 56.5

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

4
3

16-30'

1

31-45'

6
8

46-60'

7
4

61-75'

2
2

76-90+'

11
Tranent
Cumbernauld C.
Tranent

Power Rating Breakdown

53.4

Overall

Attack 53.0
Defense 58.6
Form 50.2
Consistency 52.0
Cumbernauld C.

Power Rating Breakdown

59.9

Overall

Attack 80.7
Defense 43.0
Form 56.5
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

25.0 vs 25.0

Opponent Quality

39.5 vs 34.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Tranent logo Tranent
W
Broxburn Ath. (26%)
L
Braves (48%)
D
Berwick (52%)
L
Linlithgow (62%)
D
Bo'ness Utd (26%)
W
Fairydean (28%)
W
Stirling Unv (27%)
W
Celtic (35%)
Cumbernauld C. logo Cumbernauld C.
W
Stirling Unv (22%)
L
Bo'ness Utd (30%)
W
Gretna (29%)
W
Berwick (52%)
D
Broxburn Ath. (31%)
W
Strollers (31%)
W
Fairydean (32%)
L
Tranent (50%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Broxburn Ath. H
3 - 0 W
26%
Braves A
0 - 3 L
48%
Berwick A
0 - 0 D
52%
Linlithgow H
0 - 1 L
62%
Bo'ness Utd H
1 - 1 D
26%
Fairydean H
2 - 1 W
28%
Stirling Unv A
5 - 0 W
27%
Celtic H
3 - 1 W
35%
Cumbernauld C. A
2 - 1 W
60%
Broxburn Ath. A
3 - 1 W
31%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Stirling Unv H
4 - 1 W
22%
Bo'ness Utd A
2 - 3 L
30%
Gretna H
3 - 1 W
29%
Berwick A
3 - 2 W
52%
Broxburn Ath. A
3 - 3 D
31%
Strollers A
5 - 0 W
31%
Fairydean A
3 - 2 W
32%
Tranent H
1 - 2 L
50%
Hearts H
3 - 0 W
24%
Albion H
4 - 0 W
44%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 33.7 vs 30.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Cumbernauld C.'s attack is on another level, averaging 3.1 goals per match with T. Horn leading the charge with 7 goals. Tranent manages just 1.9 per match.

Tranent has the defensive edge, conceding 0.9 per match compared to Cumbernauld C.'s 1.4.

Tranent has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Cumbernauld C. has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

The home advantage factor favors Cumbernauld C., who boasts a 80% home win rate. Playing in front of their fans could be the decisive factor.

Cumbernauld C. is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Cumbernauld C. has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 6.5 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

In their recent Highland / Lowland match (2026-03-07), Tranent prevailed 1-2 against Cumbernauld C.. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, Tranent achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Cumbernauld C. shows genuine quality and mental strength. The narrow 1-2 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Cumbernauld C. will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Tranent will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Tranent

Tranent

VS
Cumbernauld C.

Cumbernauld C.

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Tranent

6W 2D 2L · 19 goals scored · 9 conceded

Cumbernauld C.

7W 1D 2L · 31 goals scored · 14 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or