Skip to content
Compare Uzbekistan vs China

Uzbekistan vs China Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Uzbekistan vs China: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Uzbekistan Uzbekistan Home Team
China China Away Team
Uzbekistan
41.7
L W L L W L L W L W

Last 10 Matches

China
52.9
L L W W W W W W L L

Performance Radar

Uzbekistan
China

Categories Won

2

Uzbekistan

1

Draw

12

China

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 0D, 6L

60%

6W, 0D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

2.1

21 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-6

-6

+4

+4

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
10%

1 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
D. Nozimova (2 goals)
Wang Shuang (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 14
Home Win Rate
33%

1W / 3 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
43%

3W / 7 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
57.0

League Difficulty: 62.5, Opponent Quality: 55.8

45.5

League Difficulty: 62.5, Opponent Quality: 58.6

Elite Opponent Record
50%

1W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.19

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.01

2.19

Actual: 2.1 | Diff: -0.09

Adjusted Power Rating
41.7

Attack: 42.8, Defense: 42.8, Form: 42.8

52.9

Attack: 66.9, Defense: 41.4, Form: 57.3

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

16-30'

3

31-45'

2

46-60'

5
2

61-75'

1

76-90+'

3
Uzbekistan
China
Uzbekistan

Power Rating Breakdown

41.7

Overall

Attack 42.8
Defense 42.8
Form 42.8
Consistency 35.2
China

Power Rating Breakdown

52.9

Overall

Attack 66.9
Defense 41.4
Form 57.3
Consistency 35.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

62.5 vs 62.5

Opponent Quality

55.8 vs 58.6

Elite Opponent Record

50% vs 0%
Uzbekistan logo Uzbekistan
L
Thailand (87%)
W
Myanmar (75%)
L
Philippines (38%)
L
South Korea (48%)
W
Bangladesh (29%)
L
China (51%)
L
Korea DPR (59%)
W
Vietnam (57%)
China logo China
L
Football Union of Russia (72%)
L
Australia (61%)
W
Chinese Taipei (50%)
W
Korea DPR (59%)
W
Uzbekistan (44%)
W
Bangladesh (25%)
W
Vietnam (53%)
W
Vietnam (53%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Thailand A
0 - 1 L
87%
Myanmar A
1 - 0 W
75%
Philippines H
0 - 2 L
38%
South Korea A
0 - 6 L
48%
Bangladesh A
4 - 0 W
29%
China H
0 - 3 L
51%
Korea DPR A
0 - 3 L
59%
Vietnam A
6 - 2 W
57%
Vietnam A
0 - 1 L
57%
Iran H
1 - 0 W
57%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Football Union of Russia H
1 - 2 L
72%
Australia H
1 - 2 L
61%
Chinese Taipei H
2 - 0 W
50%
Korea DPR A
2 - 1 W
59%
Uzbekistan A
3 - 0 W
44%
Bangladesh H
2 - 0 W
25%
Vietnam H
6 - 1 W
53%
Vietnam H
2 - 0 W
53%
Scotland A
2 - 3 L
84%
England A
0 - 8 L
85%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

Uzbekistan has earned their numbers the hard way, posting a SoS of 57.0 against considerably stronger competition than China (SoS: 45.5). Their figures deserve greater analytical credence as a result — forged against genuinely difficult opponents.

China holds the attacking edge with 2.1 goals per match versus Uzbekistan's 1.2, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

Defensively, Uzbekistan and China are evenly matched, allowing 1.8 and 1.7 goals per game respectively.

China has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.4 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking unlikely given current form.

📈 Form Momentum: China has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.8 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, China faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.7 goals per match. If Uzbekistan can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 11.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 78% win probability for China. In practical terms, China would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

While China holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 11.2-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

In the AFC Women's Asian Cup (2026-03-06), China eliminated Uzbekistan with a 0-3 result. Cup matches bring a unique intensity, and China showed they can handle the pressure. Notably, China achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Uzbekistan shows genuine quality and mental strength. The 0-3 scoreline was emphatic — China completely dominated Uzbekistan in that encounter, raising serious questions about Uzbekistan's ability to compete at this level. Uzbekistan will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. China will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Uzbekistan

Uzbekistan

VS
China

China

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Uzbekistan

4W 0D 6L · 12 goals scored · 18 conceded

China

6W 0D 4L · 21 goals scored · 17 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or