Skip to content
Compare VPS vs TPS

VPS vs TPS Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare VPS vs TPS: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

VPS VPS Home Team
TPS TPS Away Team
VPS
58.4
W D W W D L W D D W

Last 10 Matches

TPS
39.7
L W D L L W L L W D

Performance Radar

VPS
TPS

Categories Won

9

VPS

2

Draw

4

TPS

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 4D, 1L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+10

+10

-3

-3

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
L. Smyth (7 goals)
A. Muzaci (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

75%

3W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
45.9

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.5

47.5

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 49.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.76

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.04

0.94

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.06

Adjusted Power Rating
58.4

Attack: 57.5, Defense: 70.3, Form: 47.9

39.7

Attack: 32.5, Defense: 55.2, Form: 29.2

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

1
6

31-45'

1

46-60'

4
3

61-75'

4

76-90+'

4
VPS
TPS
VPS

Power Rating Breakdown

58.4

Overall

Attack 57.5
Defense 70.3
Form 47.9
Consistency 61.3
TPS

Power Rating Breakdown

39.7

Overall

Attack 32.5
Defense 55.2
Form 29.2
Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

46.5 vs 49.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
VPS logo VPS
W
Mariehamn (22%)
D
Gnistan (60%)
W
Oulu (49%)
W
SJK (46%)
D
KuPS (62%)
L
TPS (46%)
W
HJK (49%)
D
Lahti (48%)
TPS logo TPS
L
SJK (46%)
W
Jaro (29%)
D
Lahti (48%)
L
KuPS (62%)
L
Ilves (51%)
W
VPS (58%)
L
Inter Turku (61%)
L
Oulu (54%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Mariehamn H
4 - 0 W
22%
Gnistan A
1 - 1 D
60%
Oulu H
5 - 1 W
49%
SJK A
2 - 1 W
46%
KuPS H
1 - 1 D
62%
TPS A
0 - 1 L
46%
HJK H
2 - 1 W
49%
Lahti A
1 - 1 D
48%
Gnistan H
1 - 1 D
56%
Mariehamn A
1 - 0 W
27%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
SJK A
1 - 3 L
46%
Jaro H
3 - 2 W
29%
Lahti A
0 - 0 D
48%
KuPS H
1 - 2 L
62%
Ilves A
0 - 1 L
51%
VPS H
1 - 0 W
58%
Inter Turku A
1 - 2 L
61%
Oulu A
0 - 1 L
54%
HJK H
1 - 0 W
49%
Jaro A
2 - 2 D
34%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 45.9 vs 47.5), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

VPS holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus TPS's 1.0, though the gap is not insurmountable.

VPS has the defensive edge, conceding 0.8 per match compared to TPS's 1.3.

VPS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

TPS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

The home advantage factor favors TPS, who boasts a 75% home win rate. Playing in front of their fans could be the decisive factor.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

VPS emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (58.4 vs 39.7) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

In their recent Finnish Veikkausliiga match (2026-05-30), TPS prevailed 1-0 against VPS. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. TPS secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 1-0 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. VPS will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. TPS will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

VPS

VPS

VS
TPS

TPS

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

VPS

5W 4D 1L · 18 goals scored · 8 conceded

TPS

3W 2D 5L · 10 goals scored · 13 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or