Skip to content
Compare Wealdstone vs Forest Green

Wealdstone vs Forest Green Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Wealdstone vs Forest Green: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Wealdstone Wealdstone Home Team
Forest Green Forest Green Away Team
Wealdstone
40.1
W L W D L D D L W L

Last 10 Matches

Forest Green
53.4
L D W L W L W D W W

Performance Radar

Wealdstone
Forest Green

Categories Won

3

Wealdstone

2

Draw

10

Forest Green

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

50%

5W, 2D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

2.3

23 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

+8

+8

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
O. Olomola (2 goals)
K. McAllister (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 18
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

75%

3W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
43.9

League Difficulty: 39.0, Opponent Quality: 47.1

42.2

League Difficulty: 38.0, Opponent Quality: 45.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.95

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.15

1.85

Actual: 2.3 | Diff: +0.45

Adjusted Power Rating
40.1

Attack: 34.4, Defense: 53.2, Form: 28.2

53.4

Attack: 70.7, Defense: 46.1, Form: 46.1

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

2
2

46-60'

3
1

61-75'

5
3

76-90+'

6
Wealdstone
Forest Green
Wealdstone

Power Rating Breakdown

40.1

Overall

Attack 34.4
Defense 53.2
Form 28.2
Consistency 53.2
Forest Green

Power Rating Breakdown

53.4

Overall

Attack 70.7
Defense 46.1
Form 46.1
Consistency 45.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

39.0 vs 38.0

Opponent Quality

47.1 vs 45.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Wealdstone logo Wealdstone
W
MK Dons (44%)
L
Chertsey (49%)
W
Hemel H (46%)
D
Southend (52%)
L
Southend (48%)
D
Scunthorpe (38%)
D
Boston (48%)
L
Rochdale (48%)
Forest Green logo Forest Green
L
Cardiff (68%)
D
Bristol R (64%)
W
Merthyr (41%)
L
Boreham Wood (65%)
W
Morecambe (30%)
L
Hartlepool (49%)
W
Braintree (23%)
D
Truro (46%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
MK Dons H
2 - 0 W
44%
Chertsey A
0 - 2 L
49%
Hemel H H
1 - 0 W
46%
Southend A
0 - 0 D
52%
Southend A
1 - 2 L
48%
Scunthorpe H
1 - 1 D
38%
Boston H
1 - 1 D
48%
Rochdale A
1 - 2 L
48%
Aldershot H
3 - 0 W
33%
Boreham Wood A
1 - 5 L
65%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Cardiff A
1 - 5 L
68%
Bristol R H
2 - 2 D
64%
Merthyr A
2 - 1 W
41%
Boreham Wood A
0 - 1 L
65%
Morecambe H
5 - 0 W
30%
Hartlepool A
1 - 2 L
49%
Braintree H
3 - 1 W
23%
Truro A
1 - 1 D
46%
Brackley H
4 - 0 W
29%
Eastleigh A
4 - 2 W
35%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (43.9 vs 42.2), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Forest Green possess a formidable attacking unit, with K. McAllister accounting for 5 goals and the squad maintaining an impressive 2.3 goals per game — a threat no opponent can afford to overlook.

The defensive records are closely aligned, with Wealdstone giving up 1.3 and Forest Green giving up 1.5 per fixture.

Wealdstone has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Forest Green has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Forest Green has an exceptional home record with a 75% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

📈 Form Momentum: Forest Green has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Forest Green faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If Wealdstone can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 13.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 83% win probability for Forest Green. In practical terms, Forest Green would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

While Forest Green holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 13.3-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Wealdstone

Wealdstone

VS
Forest Green

Forest Green

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Wealdstone

3W 3D 4L · 11 goals scored · 13 conceded

Forest Green

5W 2D 3L · 23 goals scored · 15 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or