Skip to content
Compare Wigan vs Reading

Wigan vs Reading Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Wigan vs Reading: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Wigan Wigan Home Team
Reading Reading Away Team
Wigan
45.3
W L L L D W W W D L

Last 10 Matches

Reading
39.7
W L L D L L L D W L

Performance Radar

Wigan
Reading

Categories Won

11

Wigan

2

Draw

2

Reading

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

20%

2W, 2D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+2

+2

-2

-2

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
30%

3 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
C. Wright (3 goals)
L. Wing (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
44.8

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 44.7

49.9

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 53.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.15

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.05

0.84

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: +0.06

Adjusted Power Rating
45.3

Attack: 37.9, Defense: 63.2, Form: 37.9

39.7

Attack: 30.0, Defense: 63.3, Form: 20.0

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

1
1

46-60'

1
2

61-75'

2
1

76-90+'

1
Wigan
Reading
Wigan

Power Rating Breakdown

45.3

Overall

Attack 37.9
Defense 63.2
Form 37.9
Consistency 44.8
Reading

Power Rating Breakdown

39.7

Overall

Attack 30.0
Defense 63.3
Form 20.0
Consistency 59.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

44.7 vs 53.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Wigan logo Wigan
W
Fylde (58%)
L
Port Vale (53%)
L
Stevenage (44%)
L
Wimbledon (36%)
D
Port Vale (58%)
W
Rotherham (37%)
W
Mansfield (52%)
W
Northampton (32%)
Reading logo Reading
W
Woking (48%)
L
Getafe (55%)
L
Blackpool (52%)
D
Rotherham (42%)
L
Cardiff (63%)
L
Doncaster (66%)
L
Lincoln (61%)
D
Huddersfield (54%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Fylde A
3 - 0 W
58%
Port Vale H
1 - 3 L
53%
Stevenage A
0 - 1 L
44%
Wimbledon H
0 - 1 L
36%
Port Vale A
0 - 0 D
58%
Rotherham H
3 - 0 W
37%
Mansfield H
2 - 1 W
52%
Northampton A
3 - 1 W
32%
L Orient H
0 - 0 D
34%
Reading A
0 - 3 L
43%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Woking A
2 - 0 W
48%
Getafe A
0 - 1 L
55%
Blackpool H
0 - 1 L
52%
Rotherham A
1 - 1 D
42%
Cardiff H
1 - 3 L
63%
Doncaster A
0 - 1 L
66%
Lincoln H
1 - 2 L
61%
Huddersfield A
1 - 1 D
54%
Wigan H
3 - 0 W
47%
Stevenage A
0 - 1 L
44%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 44.8 vs 49.9), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

The attacking output of Wigan and Reading is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 1.2 and 0.9 goals per game respectively.

Defensively, Wigan and Reading are evenly matched, allowing 1.0 and 1.1 goals per game respectively.

Wigan has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Reading has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.1 total goals. Going Under 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking unlikely given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: Reading is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

💡 Why This Matters: The 5.6-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 64% win probability for Wigan. In practical terms, Wigan would win 6 out of 10 such matchups.

While Wigan holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 5.6-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

In their recent League One match (2026-03-28), Reading prevailed 3-0 against Wigan. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Reading secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 3-0 scoreline was emphatic — Reading completely dominated Wigan in that encounter, raising serious questions about Wigan's ability to compete at this level. Wigan will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Reading will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Wigan

Wigan

VS
Reading

Reading

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Wigan

4W 2D 4L · 12 goals scored · 10 conceded

Reading

2W 2D 6L · 9 goals scored · 11 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or