Skip to content
Compare Three Towns vs Jinmen Tiger

Three Towns vs Jinmen Tiger Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Three Towns vs Jinmen Tiger: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Three Towns Three Towns Home Team
Jinmen Tiger Jinmen Tiger Away Team
Three Towns
42.0
W W L L D D D D D L

Last 10 Matches

Jinmen Tiger
50.0
W W W L W D L L D D

Performance Radar

Three Towns
Jinmen Tiger

Categories Won

5

Three Towns

2

Draw

8

Jinmen Tiger

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 5D, 3L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-1

-1

+5

+5

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Cádiz (8 goals)
Xadas (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
47.7

League Difficulty: 48.0, Opponent Quality: 47.5

47.9

League Difficulty: 48.0, Opponent Quality: 47.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.37

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: +0.13

1.26

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.04

Adjusted Power Rating
42.0

Attack: 48.9, Defense: 45.6, Form: 19.5

50.0

Attack: 42.4, Defense: 71.8, Form: 39.2

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

1
4

31-45'

2
4

46-60'

1
1

61-75'

1
2

76-90+'

6
Three Towns
Jinmen Tiger
Three Towns

Power Rating Breakdown

42.0

Overall

Attack 48.9
Defense 45.6
Form 19.5
Consistency 67.3
Jinmen Tiger

Power Rating Breakdown

50.0

Overall

Attack 42.4
Defense 71.8
Form 39.2
Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

48.0 vs 48.0

Opponent Quality

47.5 vs 47.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Three Towns logo Three Towns
W
Tonglianglong (42%)
W
Peng City (40%)
L
Yingbo (44%)
L
Guoan (63%)
D
Yukun (49%)
D
Taishan (50%)
D
Shenhua (44%)
D
Tieren (48%)
Jinmen Tiger logo Jinmen Tiger
W
Hainiu (39%)
W
Shenhua (44%)
W
Peng City (40%)
L
Tonglianglong (47%)
W
Yingbo (39%)
D
Port (55%)
L
Henan (49%)
L
Rongcheng (52%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Tonglianglong H
1 - 0 W
42%
Peng City H
2 - 0 W
40%
Yingbo A
2 - 3 L
44%
Guoan A
0 - 1 L
63%
Yukun H
1 - 1 D
49%
Taishan A
3 - 3 D
50%
Shenhua A
2 - 2 D
44%
Tieren H
2 - 2 D
48%
West Coast A
1 - 1 D
61%
Hainiu H
1 - 3 L
34%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Hainiu A
2 - 0 W
39%
Shenhua A
2 - 0 W
44%
Peng City H
3 - 0 W
40%
Tonglianglong A
0 - 1 L
47%
Yingbo H
1 - 0 W
39%
Port A
1 - 1 D
55%
Henan H
1 - 2 L
49%
Rongcheng H
1 - 2 L
52%
Zhejiang A
1 - 1 D
53%
West Coast A
1 - 1 D
61%

AI Analysis

While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (47.7 vs 47.9), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

The attacking output of Three Towns and Jinmen Tiger is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 1.5 and 1.3 goals per game respectively.

Defensively, Jinmen Tiger is far superior, conceding just 0.8 goals per match with 4 clean sheets, while Three Towns leaks 1.6 goals per match.

Three Towns has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Jinmen Tiger has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

❄️ Form Momentum: Three Towns is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📈 Form Momentum: Jinmen Tiger has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: The 8.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 70% win probability for Jinmen Tiger. In practical terms, Jinmen Tiger would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward Jinmen Tiger, with a 8.0-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Three Towns

Three Towns

VS
Jinmen Tiger

Jinmen Tiger

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Three Towns

2W 5D 3L · 15 goals scored · 16 conceded

Jinmen Tiger

4W 3D 3L · 13 goals scored · 8 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or