Skip to content
Compare Zambia vs Canada

Zambia vs Canada Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Zambia vs Canada: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Zambia Zambia Home Team
Canada Canada Away Team
Zambia
41.5
L D W D D L L W D L

Last 10 Matches

Canada
52.5
W L W W D L W L L L

Performance Radar

Zambia
Canada

Categories Won

3

Zambia

1

Draw

11

Canada

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 4D, 4L

40%

4W, 1D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-7

-7

+8

+8

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
B. Banda (2 goals)
J. Sonis (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
67%

2W / 3 matches

75%

3W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 7 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
68.0

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 67.2

50.0

League Difficulty: 69.5, Opponent Quality: 63.4

Elite Opponent Record
50%

2W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.36

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.26

2.08

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.38

Adjusted Power Rating
41.5

Attack: 43.3, Defense: 47.2, Form: 23.6

52.5

Attack: 56.7, Defense: 70.0, Form: 40.0

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

1

31-45'

3
1

46-60'

3

61-75'

3

76-90+'

6
Zambia
Canada
Zambia

Power Rating Breakdown

41.5

Overall

Attack 43.3
Defense 47.2
Form 23.6
Consistency 64.0
Canada

Power Rating Breakdown

52.5

Overall

Attack 56.7
Defense 70.0
Form 40.0
Consistency 39.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 69.5

Opponent Quality

67.2 vs 63.4

Elite Opponent Record

50% vs 0%
Zambia logo Zambia
L
Algeria (69%)
D
Algeria (69%)
W
Zimbabwe (71%)
D
Kenya (55%)
D
South Korea (62%)
L
Brazil (75%)
L
Canada (67%)
W
Zimbabwe (71%)
Canada logo Canada
W
Costa Rica (60%)
L
Brazil (75%)
W
South Korea (57%)
W
Zambia (53%)
D
Argentina (37%)
L
United States (70%)
W
Colombia (40%)
L
Japan (82%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Algeria A
0 - 1 L
69%
Algeria A
1 - 1 D
69%
Zimbabwe H
3 - 0 W
71%
Kenya H
1 - 1 D
55%
South Korea A
1 - 1 D
62%
Brazil A
1 - 6 L
75%
Canada A
0 - 4 L
67%
Zimbabwe H
3 - 1 W
71%
Malawi A
1 - 1 D
54%
South Africa A
0 - 2 L
79%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Costa Rica A
6 - 0 W
60%
Brazil A
0 - 1 L
75%
South Korea H
3 - 1 W
57%
Zambia H
4 - 0 W
53%
Argentina H
0 - 0 D
37%
United States A
0 - 1 L
70%
Colombia H
4 - 1 W
40%
Japan A
0 - 1 L
82%
Japan A
0 - 3 L
82%
Netherlands A
0 - 1 L
78%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

Zambia has earned their numbers the hard way, posting a SoS of 68.0 against considerably stronger competition than Canada (SoS: 50.0). Their figures deserve greater analytical credence as a result — forged against genuinely difficult opponents.

Offensively, Canada outperforms Zambia with 1.7 goals per match to 1.1, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.

The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for Canada — 0.9 goals conceded per game and 3 clean sheets put them well ahead of Zambia, who give up 1.8 goals per match at the other end.

Zambia has proven their mettle against elite opponents, winning 2 of 4 matches against top-tier teams. This is a crucial indicator of their ability to perform under pressure.

Canada has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Canada has an exceptional home record with a 75% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.

Statistical modeling projects 2.8 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at possible based on both sides' scoring records.

❄️ Form Momentum: Zambia is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Canada faces a key vulnerability: their away form is significantly weaker than their home record. If Zambia can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 11.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 78% win probability for Canada. In practical terms, Canada would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward Canada, with a 11.0-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

In their recent Internationals Women match (2026-04-11), Canada prevailed 4-0 against Zambia. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Canada secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 4-0 scoreline was emphatic — Canada completely dominated Zambia in that encounter, raising serious questions about Zambia's ability to compete at this level. Zambia will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Canada will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Zambia

Zambia

VS
Canada

Canada

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Zambia

2W 4D 4L · 11 goals scored · 18 conceded

Canada

4W 1D 5L · 17 goals scored · 9 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or