Skip to content
Compare Železničar P vs Brann

Železničar P vs Brann Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Železničar P vs Brann: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Železničar P Železničar P Home Team
Brann Brann Away Team
Železničar P
49.5
D D D W D D L W W L

Last 10 Matches

Brann
46.1
L L L W W W D L L W

Performance Radar

Železničar P
Brann

Categories Won

4

Železničar P

2

Draw

9

Brann

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 5D, 2L

40%

4W, 1D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

2.1

21 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+3

+3

+6

+6

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
N. Jovanović (3 goals)
N. Holm (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 11 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.1

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 51.9

38.3

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 52.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.33

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: +0.07

2.02

Actual: 2.1 | Diff: +0.08

Adjusted Power Rating
49.5

Attack: 48.1, Defense: 65.3, Form: 30.9

46.1

Attack: 61.8, Defense: 44.1, Form: 35.3

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1
2

16-30'

4
3

31-45'

6
1

46-60'

3
1

61-75'

2
7

76-90+'

5
Železničar P
Brann
Železničar P

Power Rating Breakdown

49.5

Overall

Attack 48.1
Defense 65.3
Form 30.9
Consistency 62.8
Brann

Power Rating Breakdown

46.1

Overall

Attack 61.8
Defense 44.1
Form 35.3
Consistency 39.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 50.0

Opponent Quality

51.9 vs 52.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Železničar P logo Železničar P
D
Čukarički (48%)
D
Novi Pazar (40%)
D
Radnik (46%)
W
OFK (53%)
D
Vojvodina (68%)
D
Red Star (61%)
L
Partizan (63%)
W
Javor (52%)
Brann logo Brann
L
Sarpsborg (42%)
L
Bodø/Glimt (67%)
L
Aalesund (50%)
W
KFUM (39%)
W
Fredrikstad (47%)
W
Tromsø (55%)
D
Rosenborg (44%)
L
Viking (76%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Čukarički H
0 - 0 D
48%
Novi Pazar A
2 - 2 D
40%
Radnik H
1 - 1 D
46%
OFK H
2 - 0 W
53%
Vojvodina A
0 - 0 D
68%
Red Star H
2 - 2 D
61%
Partizan A
1 - 2 L
63%
Javor A
2 - 1 W
52%
Novi Pazar H
2 - 0 W
35%
Čukarički A
2 - 3 L
53%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sarpsborg H
1 - 2 L
42%
Bodø/Glimt A
1 - 3 L
67%
Aalesund A
1 - 2 L
50%
KFUM H
2 - 1 W
39%
Fredrikstad H
3 - 1 W
47%
Tromsø A
5 - 0 W
55%
Rosenborg A
1 - 1 D
44%
Viking A
2 - 3 L
76%
Sandefjord H
0 - 1 L
47%
HamKam A
5 - 1 W
57%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Železničar P has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 53.1) compared to Brann (SoS: 38.3). This means Železničar P's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Brann holds the attacking edge with 2.1 goals per match versus Železničar P's 1.4, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Železničar P has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to Brann's 1.5.

Železničar P has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Železničar P

Železničar P

VS
Brann

Brann

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Železničar P

3W 5D 2L · 14 goals scored · 11 conceded

Brann

4W 1D 5L · 21 goals scored · 15 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or