Skip to content
Compare Zrinjski vs Valur

Zrinjski vs Valur Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Zrinjski vs Valur: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Zrinjski Zrinjski Home Team
Valur Valur Away Team
Zrinjski
48.0
D L W W L D D L

Last 10 Matches

Valur
31.9
L L D W

Performance Radar

Zrinjski
Valur

Categories Won

6

Zrinjski

4

Draw

5

Valur

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
25%

2W, 3D, 3L

25%

1W, 1D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

13 / 8 matches

0.8

3 / 4 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

9 / 8 matches

2.2

9 / 4 matches

Goal Difference
+4

+4

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
12%

1 / 8 matches

25%

1 / 4 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
38%

3 / 8 matches

50%

2 / 4 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

4 / 8 matches

25%

1 / 4 matches

Top Scorer
N. Cvetković (1 goals)
T. Haraldsson (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 12
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 1
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

50%

1W / 2 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
49.5

League Difficulty: 69.8, Opponent Quality: 61.6

56.7

League Difficulty: 78.0, Opponent Quality: 72.8

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.69

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: -0.07

0.82

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.07

Adjusted Power Rating
48.0

Attack: 53.1, Defense: 63.0, Form: 24.9

31.9

Attack: 28.5, Defense: 28.5, Form: 26.7

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

1
1

46-60'

1
1

61-75'

1
1

76-90+'

Zrinjski
Valur
Zrinjski

Power Rating Breakdown

48.0

Overall

Attack 53.1
Defense 63.0
Form 24.9
Consistency 59.2
Valur

Power Rating Breakdown

31.9

Overall

Attack 28.5
Defense 28.5
Form 26.7
Consistency 55.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

69.8 vs 78.0

Opponent Quality

61.6 vs 72.8

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Zrinjski logo Zrinjski
D
Valur (66%)
L
Valur (68%)
W
Posušje (42%)
W
Arsenal (42%)
L
C Palace (63%)
D
C Palace (58%)
D
Rapid Vienna (85%)
L
Raków (69%)
Valur logo Valur
L
Nordsjælland (83%)
L
Nordsjælland (78%)
D
Zrinjski (67%)
W
Zrinjski (63%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Valur H
2 - 2 D
66%
Valur A
0 - 1 L
68%
Posušje H
3 - 1 W
42%
Arsenal H
6 - 0 W
42%
C Palace A
0 - 2 L
63%
C Palace H
1 - 1 D
58%
Rapid Vienna H
1 - 1 D
85%
Raków A
0 - 1 L
69%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Nordsjælland A
0 - 5 L
83%
Nordsjælland H
0 - 2 L
78%
Zrinjski A
2 - 2 D
67%
Zrinjski H
1 - 0 W
63%

AI Analysis

Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 49.5 vs 56.7), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Zrinjski holds the attacking edge with 1.6 goals per match versus Valur's 0.8, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

Defensively, Zrinjski is far superior, conceding just 1.1 goals per match with 1 clean sheets, while Valur leaks 2.2 goals per match.

Statistical modeling projects 2.9 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at unlikely based on both sides' scoring records.

❄️ Form Momentum: Zrinjski is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 8 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

❄️ Form Momentum: Valur is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 4 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Zrinjski faces a key vulnerability: they have kept only 1 clean sheets in their last 10 matches. If Valur can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 16.1-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Zrinjski. In practical terms, Zrinjski would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Zrinjski emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (48.0 vs 31.9) and advantages in key areas, they should have enough to prevail.

These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. These two teams drew 2-2 in the UEFA Conference League (2026-07-30). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning. In their recent UEFA Conference League encounter (2026-07-23), Valur came out on top with a 1-0 victory over Zrinjski. European competition results carry significant weight in assessing the balance of power between these sides. Valur secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 1-0 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Zrinjski will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Valur will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Zrinjski

Zrinjski

VS
Valur

Valur

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Zrinjski

2W 3D 3L · 13 goals scored · 9 conceded

Valur

1W 1D 2L · 3 goals scored · 9 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or