Zrinjski vs Valur Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Zrinjski vs Valur: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Zrinjski
Draw
Valur
Statistical Comparison
2W, 3D, 3L
1W, 1D, 2L
13 / 8 matches
3 / 4 matches
9 / 8 matches
9 / 4 matches
+4
-6
1 / 8 matches
1 / 4 matches
3 / 8 matches
2 / 4 matches
4 / 8 matches
1 / 4 matches
2W / 5 matches
1W / 2 matches
0W / 3 matches
0W / 2 matches
League Difficulty: 69.8, Opponent Quality: 61.6
League Difficulty: 78.0, Opponent Quality: 72.8
0W / 1 matches
0W / 2 matches
Actual: 1.6 | Diff: -0.07
Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.07
Attack: 53.1, Defense: 63.0, Form: 24.9
Attack: 28.5, Defense: 28.5, Form: 26.7
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 49.5 vs 56.7), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Zrinjski holds the attacking edge with 1.6 goals per match versus Valur's 0.8, though the gap isn't insurmountable.
Defensively, Zrinjski is far superior, conceding just 1.1 goals per match with 1 clean sheets, while Valur leaks 2.2 goals per match.
Statistical modeling projects 2.9 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at unlikely based on both sides' scoring records.
❄️ Form Momentum: Zrinjski is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 8 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
❄️ Form Momentum: Valur is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 4 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Zrinjski faces a key vulnerability: they have kept only 1 clean sheets in their last 10 matches. If Valur can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 16.1-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Zrinjski. In practical terms, Zrinjski would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Zrinjski emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (48.0 vs 31.9) and advantages in key areas, they should have enough to prevail.
These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. These two teams drew 2-2 in the UEFA Conference League (2026-07-30). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning. In their recent UEFA Conference League encounter (2026-07-23), Valur came out on top with a 1-0 victory over Zrinjski. European competition results carry significant weight in assessing the balance of power between these sides. Valur secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 1-0 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Zrinjski will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Valur will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Zrinjski
Valur
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Zrinjski
2W 3D 3L · 13 goals scored · 9 conceded
Valur
1W 1D 2L · 3 goals scored · 9 conceded
Popular Teams