Zürich vs Lausanne Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Zürich vs Lausanne: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Zürich
Home Team
Lausanne
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Zürich
Draw
Lausanne
Statistical Comparison
2W, 1D, 7L
3W, 1D, 6L
10 / 10 matches
12 / 10 matches
18 / 10 matches
19 / 10 matches
-8
-7
0 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
2W / 5 matches
3W / 6 matches
0W / 5 matches
0W / 4 matches
League Difficulty: 51.0, Opponent Quality: 51.9
League Difficulty: 51.0, Opponent Quality: 49.8
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.04
Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.12
Attack: 33.8, Defense: 40.6, Form: 20.3
Attack: 40.1, Defense: 36.8, Form: 30.1
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Zürich
Lausanne
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
On paper, these teams are closely aligned, and the data backs that up. Raw statistics can be misleading without context, but strength-of-opponent adjustments reinforce just how competitive this matchup is. Neither side has padded their numbers against weak opposition.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 51.5 vs 50.3), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.
Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Zürich averaging 1.0 and Lausanne averaging 1.2 goals per match.
Both defenses are comparable, with Zürich conceding 1.8 and Lausanne conceding 1.9 per match.
Zürich has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Lausanne has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Statistical modeling projects 3.0 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.
❄️ Form Momentum: Zürich is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.
💡 Why This Matters: Zürich's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.
Statistically, there is very little to choose between these two teams. The numbers point to an evenly contested match where fine details and in-game decisions will likely prove decisive.
In their recent Swiss Super League match (2026-04-25), Lausanne prevailed 3-0 against Zürich. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Lausanne secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 3-0 scoreline was emphatic — Lausanne completely dominated Zürich in that encounter, raising serious questions about Zürich's ability to compete at this level. Zürich will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Lausanne will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Zürich
Lausanne
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Zürich
2W 1D 7L · 10 goals scored · 18 conceded
Lausanne
3W 1D 6L · 12 goals scored · 19 conceded
Popular Teams