Earthquakes vs Galaxy Estadísticas Cara a Cara y Comparación de Forma
Compará Earthquakes vs Galaxy: estadísticas mano a mano, forma reciente, goles, récord defensivo e indicadores de fuerza de los últimos partidos.
Earthquakes
Equipo Local
Galaxy
Equipo Visitante
Comparar...
Radar de Rendimiento
Categorías Ganadas
Earthquakes
Empate
Galaxy
Comparación Estadística
1V, 2E, 7D
2V, 4E, 4D
13 / 10 partidos
9 / 10 partidos
26 / 10 partidos
14 / 10 partidos
-13
-5
0 / 10 partidos
3 / 10 partidos
7 / 10 partidos
4 / 10 partidos
8 / 10 partidos
5 / 10 partidos
0V / 6 partidos
1V / 5 partidos
1V / 4 partidos
1V / 5 partidos
Dificultad de Liga: 55.0, Calidad del Rival: 51.8
Dificultad de Liga: 55.0, Calidad del Rival: 51.2
0V / 0 partidos
0V / 1 partidos
Real: 1.3 | Dif: +0.04
Real: 0.9 | Dif: +0.01
Ataque: 44.7, Defensa: 13.7, Forma: 10.3
Ataque: 27.0, Defensa: 47.9, Forma: 18.0
Análisis de Tiempos de Gol
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Desglose de Poder
General
Desglose de Poder
General
Dificultad del Calendario
Mide la dificultad de los rivales enfrentados. Mayor = calendario más difícil.
Dificultad de Liga
Calidad del Rival
Récord contra Élite
Earthquakes
Galaxy
Calidad del Rival: La calidad combina la fuerza de la liga, la forma reciente por puntos, la diferencia de goles y el contexto local/visitante. No es solo tamaño o reputación del club.
Análisis IA
Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.
Context matters here: Earthquakes's schedule strength (SoS: 53.1) has been notably more demanding than Galaxy's (SoS: 39.9), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.
Earthquakes holds the attacking edge with 1.3 goals per match versus Galaxy's 0.9, though the gap isn't insurmountable.
The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for Galaxy — 1.4 goals conceded per game and 3 clean sheets put them well ahead of Earthquakes, who give up 2.6 goals per match at the other end.
Earthquakes has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.1 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.
❄️ Form Momentum: Earthquakes is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
❄️ Form Momentum: Galaxy is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Galaxy faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If Earthquakes can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: Earthquakes's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.
These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. In their recent Major League Soccer match (2026-08-20), Galaxy prevailed 1-0 against Earthquakes. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Galaxy secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 1-0 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Earthquakes will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Galaxy will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost. These two teams drew 1-1 in the Major League Soccer (2026-07-26). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Simulador de Partido
Simulación de partido con IA basada en estadísticas reales
Earthquakes
Galaxy
En los enfrentamientos H2H (cara a cara), para eliminar las fluctuaciones momentáneas y las casualidades, limitamos nuestros análisis a una profundidad óptima de exactamente 10 partidos. Ni más, ni menos. Este enfoque preciso es nuestro estándar de oro indiscutible, que revela en su forma más pura la superioridad táctica y psicológica que un equipo ejerce sobre otro. No nos dejamos llevar por el ruido del pasado, sino que nos enfocamos en la precisión milimétrica de la forma actual.
Resumen de enfrentamientos directos
Esta comparación cara a cara analiza los últimos 10 partidos de cada equipo, evaluando la potencia ofensiva, la solidez defensiva, la consistencia del rendimiento y las métricas generales de rendimiento. Las calificaciones de poder se calculan mediante un algoritmo ponderado que considera los goles a favor, los goles en contra, el porcentaje de victorias y las tendencias recientes de forma.
Earthquakes
1W 2D 7L · 13 goles a favor · 26 goles en contra
Galaxy
2W 4D 4L · 9 goles a favor · 14 goles en contra
Equipos Populares