Cuba vs Granada Estadísticas Cara a Cara y Comparación de Forma
Compara Cuba vs Granada: estadísticas cara a cara, forma reciente, goles, récord defensivo e indicadores de fuerza de los últimos partidos.
Cuba
Equipo Local
Granada
Equipo Visitante
Comparar...
Radar de Rendimiento
Categorías Ganadas
Cuba
Empate
Granada
Comparación Estadística
2V, 1E, 4D
6V, 0E, 4D
6 / 7 partidos
21 / 10 partidos
13 / 7 partidos
17 / 10 partidos
-7
+4
2 / 7 partidos
3 / 10 partidos
3 / 7 partidos
7 / 10 partidos
2 / 7 partidos
3 / 10 partidos
1V / 2 partidos
5V / 7 partidos
1V / 5 partidos
1V / 3 partidos
Dificultad de Liga: 70.0, Calidad del Rival: 59.7
Dificultad de Liga: 73.0, Calidad del Rival: 57.5
0V / 3 partidos
0V / 1 partidos
Real: 0.9 | Dif: -0.17
Real: 2.1 | Dif: +0.1
Ataque: 29.7, Defensa: 36.3, Forma: 28.7
Ataque: 69.5, Defensa: 43.0, Forma: 59.6
Análisis de Tiempos de Gol
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Desglose de Poder
General
Desglose de Poder
General
Dificultad del Calendario
Mide la dificultad de los rivales enfrentados. Mayor = calendario más difícil.
Dificultad de Liga
Calidad del Rival
Récord contra Élite
Cuba
Granada
Calidad del Rival: La calidad combina la fuerza de la liga, la forma reciente por puntos, la diferencia de goles y el contexto local/visitante. No es solo tamaño o reputación del club.
Análisis IA
Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 48.9 vs 49.3), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Grenada possess a formidable attacking unit, with J. Francis accounting for 2 goals and the squad maintaining an impressive 2.1 goals per game — a threat no opponent can afford to overlook.
Both defenses are comparable, with Cuba conceding 1.9 and Grenada conceding 1.7 per match.
Cuba has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Statistical modeling projects 3.3 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at unlikely based on both sides' scoring records.
❄️ Form Momentum: Cuba is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 7 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📈 Form Momentum: Grenada has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.8 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Grenada is on the rise with 6W in last 10, while Cuba shows signs of decline with 2W in last 7.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Grenada faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.7 goals per match. If Cuba can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 20.9-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Grenada. In practical terms, Grenada would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers point firmly toward Grenada in this contest. Their superior power rating of 54.8, compared to 33.9 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.
In their recent Internationals match (2025-10-12), Grenada prevailed 2-0 against Cuba. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Grenada secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. Cuba will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Grenada will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Simulador de Partido
Simulación de partido con IA basada en estadísticas reales
Cuba
Granada
En los enfrentamientos H2H (duelos directos), para eliminar las fluctuaciones momentáneas y las casualidades, limitamos nuestros análisis a una profundidad óptima de exactamente 10 partidos. Ni más, ni menos. Este enfoque preciso es nuestro estándar de oro indiscutible, que revela en su forma más pura la superioridad táctica y psicológica que un equipo impone sobre otro. No nos dejamos llevar por el ruido del pasado, sino que nos enfocamos en la precisión milimétrica de la forma actual.
Resumen comparativo
Esta comparación de enfrentamientos directos analiza los últimos 10 partidos de cada equipo, evaluando la potencia ofensiva, la solidez defensiva, la consistencia en la forma y las métricas generales de rendimiento. Las valoraciones de potencia se calculan mediante un algoritmo ponderado que considera los goles marcados, los goles en contra, la tasa de victorias y las tendencias recientes de forma.
Cuba
2W 1D 4L · 6 goles marcados · 13 goles en contra
Granada
6W 0D 4L · 21 goles marcados · 17 goles en contra
Equipos Populares