Skip to content
Compare AZ vs NAC

AZ vs NAC Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare AZ vs NAC: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

AZ AZ Home Team
NAC NAC Away Team
AZ
52.3
D D D D D W L W L W

Last 10 Matches

NAC
31.9
D W L L D D L L D L

Performance Radar

AZ
NAC

Categories Won

13

AZ

2

Draw

0

NAC

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 5D, 2L

10%

1W, 4D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

2.2

22 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+3

+3

-12

-12

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
S. Mijnans (5 goals)
M. Soumano (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
59.0

League Difficulty: 79.4, Opponent Quality: 65.7

54.3

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 63.8

Elite Opponent Record
17%

1W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.94

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.24

1.27

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.27

Adjusted Power Rating
52.3

Attack: 61.8, Defense: 58.1, Form: 32.7

31.9

Attack: 34.8, Defense: 27.8, Form: 10.4

Goal Timing Analysis

9

0-15'

16-30'

1

31-45'

2
1

46-60'

1
4

61-75'

4
3

76-90+'

2
AZ
NAC
AZ

Power Rating Breakdown

52.3

Overall

Attack 61.8
Defense 58.1
Form 32.7
Consistency 62.8
NAC

Power Rating Breakdown

31.9

Overall

Attack 34.8
Defense 27.8
Form 10.4
Consistency 75.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

79.4 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

65.7 vs 63.8

Elite Opponent Record

17% vs 0%
AZ logo AZ
D
NAC (47%)
D
Feyenoord (72%)
D
Twente (70%)
D
Go Ahead (64%)
D
Shakhtar D (70%)
W
Heerenveen (65%)
L
Shakhtar D (75%)
W
Fortuna (51%)
NAC logo NAC
D
AZ (68%)
W
Heerenveen (65%)
L
Utrecht (77%)
L
Ajax (68%)
D
Fortuna (56%)
D
Sparta (44%)
L
Zwolle (56%)
L
Go Ahead (64%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
NAC H
3 - 3 D
47%
Feyenoord A
1 - 1 D
72%
Twente H
2 - 2 D
70%
Go Ahead A
0 - 0 D
64%
Shakhtar D H
2 - 2 D
70%
Heerenveen H
3 - 0 W
65%
Shakhtar D A
0 - 3 L
75%
Fortuna H
2 - 0 W
51%
Groningen A
0 - 3 L
70%
Sparta Prague A
4 - 0 W
73%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
AZ A
3 - 3 D
68%
Heerenveen H
2 - 0 W
65%
Utrecht A
0 - 2 L
77%
Ajax H
0 - 2 L
68%
Fortuna A
1 - 1 D
56%
Sparta H
0 - 0 D
44%
Zwolle A
1 - 2 L
56%
Go Ahead A
0 - 6 L
64%
Feyenoord H
3 - 3 D
67%
Telstar A
0 - 3 L
73%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 59.0 vs 54.3), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

AZ holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus NAC's 1.0, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Defensively, AZ is far superior, conceding just 1.4 goals per match with 4 clean sheets, while NAC leaks 2.2 per match.

AZ has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 6 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

AZ emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (52.3 vs 31.9) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

These two teams drew 3-3 in the Dutch Eredivisie (2026-05-17). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

AZ

AZ

VS
NAC

NAC

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

AZ

3W 5D 2L · 17 goals scored · 14 conceded

NAC

1W 4D 5L · 10 goals scored · 22 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or