Skip to content
Compare Barrow vs Gillingham

Barrow vs Gillingham Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Barrow vs Gillingham: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Barrow Barrow Home Team
Gillingham Gillingham Away Team
Barrow
37.2
D L L W W D W L L L

Last 10 Matches

Gillingham
36.6
D L L W W L W W L L

Performance Radar

Barrow
Gillingham

Categories Won

7

Barrow

4

Draw

4

Gillingham

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 2D, 5L

40%

4W, 1D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-5

-5

-8

-8

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
I. Cameron (2 goals)
G. McCleary (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
43.7

League Difficulty: 40.5, Opponent Quality: 45.8

45.9

League Difficulty: 42.5, Opponent Quality: 48.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.12

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.08

0.85

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.15

Adjusted Power Rating
37.2

Attack: 37.5, Defense: 40.6, Form: 28.1

36.6

Attack: 32.0, Defense: 38.4, Form: 38.4

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1

16-30'

1

31-45'

46-60'

1

61-75'

3

76-90+'

2
Barrow
Gillingham
Barrow

Power Rating Breakdown

37.2

Overall

Attack 37.5
Defense 40.6
Form 28.1
Consistency 49.3
Gillingham

Power Rating Breakdown

36.6

Overall

Attack 32.0
Defense 38.4
Form 38.4
Consistency 39.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

40.5 vs 42.5

Opponent Quality

45.8 vs 48.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Barrow logo Barrow
D
Harrogate (62%)
L
Hornchurch (49%)
L
Hartlepool (46%)
W
Morecambe (30%)
W
Blackpool (52%)
D
Radcliffe (39%)
W
Mansfield (43%)
L
Newport (44%)
Gillingham logo Gillingham
D
Fleetwood (56%)
L
Walsall (36%)
L
Luton (59%)
W
Ebbsfleet (55%)
W
Millwall (47%)
L
Charlton (49%)
W
Dover (36%)
W
Shrewsbury (33%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Harrogate A
2 - 2 D
62%
Hornchurch H
1 - 2 L
49%
Hartlepool A
0 - 2 L
46%
Morecambe A
1 - 0 W
30%
Blackpool H
2 - 0 W
52%
Radcliffe A
0 - 0 D
39%
Mansfield H
4 - 3 W
43%
Newport H
1 - 2 L
44%
Cambridge U A
0 - 3 L
57%
Walsall H
1 - 3 L
36%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Fleetwood A
0 - 0 D
56%
Walsall H
0 - 3 L
36%
Luton H
0 - 3 L
59%
Ebbsfleet A
2 - 1 W
55%
Millwall H
1 - 0 W
47%
Charlton H
0 - 1 L
49%
Dover A
3 - 0 W
36%
Shrewsbury H
1 - 0 W
33%
Barnet A
2 - 6 L
60%
Grimsby H
1 - 4 L
51%

AI Analysis

Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 43.7 vs 45.9), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Barrow (1.2 goals per match) and Gillingham (1.0 goals per match) present comparable offensive threats, making this an evenly contested attacking matchup.

The defensive records are closely aligned, with Barrow giving up 1.7 and Gillingham giving up 1.8 per fixture.

Barrow has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Gillingham has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.

⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.

💡 Why This Matters: Gillingham's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

Statistically, there is very little to choose between these two teams. The numbers point to an evenly contested match where fine details and in-game decisions will likely prove decisive.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Barrow

Barrow

VS
Gillingham

Gillingham

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Barrow

3W 2D 5L · 12 goals scored · 17 conceded

Gillingham

4W 1D 5L · 10 goals scored · 18 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or