Skip to content
Compare Bedford vs Curzon Ashton

Bedford vs Curzon Ashton Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Bedford vs Curzon Ashton: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Bedford Bedford Home Team
Curzon Ashton Curzon Ashton Away Team
Bedford
43.4
W D D D W W D L W L

Last 10 Matches

Curzon Ashton
29.4
D D L W L D L D L L

Performance Radar

Bedford
Curzon Ashton

Categories Won

9

Bedford

3

Draw

3

Curzon Ashton

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 4D, 2L

10%

1W, 4D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

2.1

21 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

-11

-11

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
G. Moncur (3 goals)
T. Weston (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
37.1

League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 40.9

38.0

League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 42.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.13

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.17

0.84

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.16

Adjusted Power Rating
43.4

Attack: 37.7, Defense: 52.3, Form: 34.8

29.4

Attack: 29.3, Defense: 26.4, Form: 8.8

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

2

16-30'

1

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

2
3

61-75'

1
2

76-90+'

4
Bedford
Curzon Ashton
Bedford

Power Rating Breakdown

43.4

Overall

Attack 37.7
Defense 52.3
Form 34.8
Consistency 56.8
Curzon Ashton

Power Rating Breakdown

29.4

Overall

Attack 29.3
Defense 26.4
Form 8.8
Consistency 75.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

31.5 vs 31.5

Opponent Quality

40.9 vs 42.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Bedford logo Bedford
W
Walton & H (46%)
D
Scarborough (40%)
D
South Shields (47%)
D
Hereford (40%)
W
King's Lynn (40%)
W
Leamington (26%)
D
Telford (39%)
L
Buxton (60%)
Curzon Ashton logo Curzon Ashton
D
Clitheroe (43%)
D
Alfreton (44%)
L
Buxton (55%)
W
Chorley (37%)
L
Southport (44%)
D
Radcliffe (30%)
L
Chester (46%)
D
King's Lynn (40%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Walton & H H
2 - 0 W
46%
Scarborough H
1 - 1 D
40%
South Shields A
1 - 1 D
47%
Hereford H
2 - 2 D
40%
King's Lynn A
1 - 0 W
40%
Leamington H
3 - 1 W
26%
Telford A
2 - 2 D
39%
Buxton A
0 - 3 L
60%
Radcliffe H
1 - 0 W
25%
Worksop H
0 - 2 L
46%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Clitheroe H
1 - 1 D
43%
Alfreton A
3 - 3 D
44%
Buxton H
0 - 4 L
55%
Chorley A
1 - 0 W
37%
Southport H
1 - 3 L
44%
Radcliffe A
3 - 3 D
30%
Chester H
0 - 1 L
46%
King's Lynn A
0 - 0 D
40%
Spennymoor A
1 - 4 L
45%
Macclesfield H
0 - 2 L
39%

AI Analysis

While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 37.1 vs 38.0), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Bedford holds the attacking edge with 1.3 goals per match versus Curzon Ashton's 1.0, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

Bedford holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 1.2 goals per game and recording 3 clean sheets, compared to Curzon Ashton's leaky backline that surrenders 2.1 goals per match.

Bedford has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Curzon Ashton has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.

📈 Form Momentum: Bedford has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

❄️ Form Momentum: Curzon Ashton is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Bedford is on the rise with 4W in last 10, while Curzon Ashton shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.

💡 Why This Matters: The 14.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Bedford. In practical terms, Bedford would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Bedford has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 14.0-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Bedford

Bedford

VS
Curzon Ashton

Curzon Ashton

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Bedford

4W 4D 2L · 13 goals scored · 12 conceded

Curzon Ashton

1W 4D 5L · 10 goals scored · 21 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or