Bedford vs Macclesfield Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Bedford vs Macclesfield: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Bedford
Home Team
Macclesfield
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Bedford
Draw
Macclesfield
Statistical Comparison
4W, 4D, 2L
4W, 2D, 4L
13 / 10 matches
16 / 10 matches
12 / 10 matches
18 / 10 matches
+1
-2
3 / 10 matches
0 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
3W / 6 matches
2W / 3 matches
1W / 4 matches
2W / 7 matches
League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 40.9
League Difficulty: 34.5, Opponent Quality: 45.3
0W / 0 matches
0W / 1 matches
Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.17
Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.01
Attack: 37.7, Defense: 52.3, Form: 34.8
Attack: 42.5, Defense: 31.9, Form: 31.9
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Bedford
Macclesfield
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 37.1 vs 29.7), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.
Offensively, Macclesfield outperforms Bedford with 1.6 goals per match to 1.3, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.
Bedford's backline outperforms Macclesfield's, with 1.2 goals conceded per match versus 1.8.
Bedford has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.9 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.
📈 Form Momentum: Bedford has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
💡 Why This Matters: The 6.4-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 66% win probability for Bedford. In practical terms, Bedford would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.
While Bedford holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 6.4-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Bedford
Macclesfield
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Bedford
4W 4D 2L · 13 goals scored · 12 conceded
Macclesfield
4W 2D 4L · 16 goals scored · 18 conceded
Popular Teams