Skip to content
Compare Cambridge U vs Walsall

Cambridge U vs Walsall Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Cambridge U vs Walsall: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Cambridge U Cambridge U Home Team
Walsall Walsall Away Team
Cambridge U
50.1
D W W D D W D W L D

Last 10 Matches

Walsall
34.4
D W W D L L L L W L

Performance Radar

Cambridge U
Walsall

Categories Won

11

Cambridge U

2

Draw

2

Walsall

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 5D, 1L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.6

6 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+5

+5

-8

-8

Clean Sheet
60%

6 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
B. Knight (4 goals)
M. Hancock (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
44.4

League Difficulty: 43.0, Opponent Quality: 45.4

44.2

League Difficulty: 42.0, Opponent Quality: 45.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.06

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.04

0.73

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.07

Adjusted Power Rating
50.1

Attack: 34.6, Defense: 75.5, Form: 37.8

34.4

Attack: 25.1, Defense: 44.0, Form: 28.3

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

16-30'

3

31-45'

1
4

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

2

76-90+'

3
Cambridge U
Walsall
Cambridge U

Power Rating Breakdown

50.1

Overall

Attack 34.6
Defense 75.5
Form 37.8
Consistency 63.7
Walsall

Power Rating Breakdown

34.4

Overall

Attack 25.1
Defense 44.0
Form 28.3
Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

43.0 vs 42.0

Opponent Quality

45.4 vs 45.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Cambridge U logo Cambridge U
D
Bromley (48%)
W
Wigan (36%)
W
Barnet (56%)
D
Norwich (50%)
D
Northampton (39%)
W
Preston (39%)
D
Crewe (51%)
W
Barrow (38%)
Walsall logo Walsall
D
Grimsby (51%)
W
Gillingham (43%)
W
Bristol C (47%)
D
Notts Co (46%)
L
Telford (42%)
L
A Villa (42%)
L
Bromley (46%)
L
Harrogate (59%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Bromley A
1 - 1 D
48%
Wigan H
3 - 2 W
36%
Barnet H
2 - 1 W
56%
Norwich A
0 - 0 D
50%
Northampton H
0 - 0 D
39%
Preston A
1 - 0 W
39%
Crewe A
0 - 0 D
51%
Barrow H
3 - 0 W
38%
Grimsby H
1 - 2 L
51%
Bromley A
0 - 0 D
46%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Grimsby H
0 - 0 D
51%
Gillingham A
3 - 0 W
43%
Bristol C A
1 - 0 W
47%
Notts Co H
0 - 0 D
46%
Telford A
0 - 1 L
42%
A Villa H
0 - 5 L
42%
Bromley A
1 - 3 L
46%
Harrogate H
0 - 2 L
59%
Barrow A
3 - 1 W
43%
Cheltenham H
0 - 4 L
38%

AI Analysis

Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (44.4 vs 44.2), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Cambridge U leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.1 goals per game compared to Walsall's 0.8 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

Cambridge U holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 0.6 goals per game and recording 6 clean sheets, compared to Walsall's leaky backline that surrenders 1.6 goals per match.

Cambridge U has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Walsall has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Walsall is a strong road performer with a 60% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Statistical modeling projects 2.0 goals in this fixture. The data points Under 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at unlikely based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: Cambridge U has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: The 15.7-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Cambridge U. In practical terms, Cambridge U would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers point firmly toward Cambridge U in this contest. Their superior power rating of 50.1, compared to 34.4 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Cambridge U

Cambridge U

VS
Walsall

Walsall

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Cambridge U

4W 5D 1L · 11 goals scored · 6 conceded

Walsall

3W 2D 5L · 8 goals scored · 16 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or