Charlton vs Forest Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Charlton vs Forest: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Charlton
Home Team
Forest
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Charlton
Draw
Forest
Statistical Comparison
2W, 3D, 5L
4W, 2D, 4L
8 / 10 matches
9 / 10 matches
13 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
-5
-5
3 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
1W / 5 matches
3W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.5
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 47.1
0W / 1 matches
0W / 1 matches
Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.09
Actual: 0.9 | Diff: +0.13
Attack: 22.5, Defense: 47.8, Form: 16.9
Attack: 25.3, Defense: 45.1, Form: 33.8
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Charlton
Forest
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (34.3 vs 34.5), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
Charlton (0.8 goals per match) and Forest (0.9 goals per match) present comparable offensive threats, making this an evenly contested attacking matchup.
Both defenses are comparable, with Charlton conceding 1.3 and Forest conceding 1.4 per match.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.2 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.
❄️ Form Momentum: Charlton is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.
💡 Why This Matters: Forest's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.
The data offers no clear edge here. These sides are separated by the finest of margins across every key metric, making the final result almost impossible to call in advance.
In their recent English WSL 2 match (2026-02-08), Charlton prevailed 0-2 against Forest. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, Charlton achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Forest shows genuine quality and mental strength. Forest will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Charlton will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Charlton
Forest
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Charlton
2W 3D 5L · 8 goals scored · 13 conceded
Forest
4W 2D 4L · 9 goals scored · 14 conceded
Popular Teams