China vs Uzbekistan Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare China vs Uzbekistan: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
China
Home Team
Uzbekistan
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
China
Draw
Uzbekistan
Statistical Comparison
6W, 0D, 4L
4W, 0D, 6L
21 / 10 matches
12 / 10 matches
17 / 10 matches
18 / 10 matches
+4
-6
4 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
1 / 10 matches
4W / 6 matches
1W / 3 matches
2W / 4 matches
3W / 7 matches
League Difficulty: 62.5, Opponent Quality: 58.6
League Difficulty: 62.5, Opponent Quality: 55.8
0W / 3 matches
1W / 2 matches
Actual: 2.1 | Diff: -0.09
Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.01
Attack: 66.9, Defense: 41.4, Form: 57.3
Attack: 42.8, Defense: 42.8, Form: 42.8
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
China
Uzbekistan
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.
Uzbekistan has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 57.0) compared to China (SoS: 45.5). This means Uzbekistan's statistics carry more weight - they've been battle-tested against quality opponents.
China holds the attacking edge with 2.1 goals per match versus Uzbekistan's 1.2, though the gap isn't insurmountable.
The defensive records are closely aligned, with China giving up 1.7 and Uzbekistan giving up 1.8 per fixture.
China has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.4 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being unlikely.
📈 Form Momentum: China has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.8 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, China faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.7 goals per match. If Uzbekistan can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 11.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 78% win probability for China. In practical terms, China would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers lean toward China, with a 11.2-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.
In the AFC Women's Asian Cup (2026-03-06), China eliminated Uzbekistan with a 0-3 result. Cup matches bring a unique intensity, and China showed they can handle the pressure. Notably, China achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Uzbekistan shows genuine quality and mental strength. The 0-3 scoreline was emphatic — China completely dominated Uzbekistan in that encounter, raising serious questions about Uzbekistan's ability to compete at this level. Uzbekistan will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. China will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
China
Uzbekistan
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
China
6W 0D 4L · 21 goals scored · 17 conceded
Uzbekistan
4W 0D 6L · 12 goals scored · 18 conceded
Popular Teams