Skip to content
Compare Clydebank vs Broxburn Ath.

Clydebank vs Broxburn Ath. Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Clydebank vs Broxburn Ath.: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Clydebank Clydebank Home Team
Broxburn Ath. Broxburn Ath. Away Team
Clydebank
69.2
W L W W W W W W W L

Last 10 Matches

Broxburn Ath.
28.4
L D L D L D D L W D

Performance Radar

Clydebank
Broxburn Ath.

Categories Won

11

Clydebank

2

Draw

2

Broxburn Ath.

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
80%

8W, 0D, 2L

10%

1W, 5D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
3.4

34 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.9

9 / 10 matches

2.5

25 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+25

+25

-13

-13

Clean Sheet
60%

6 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
N. McLaughlin (10 goals)
J. Docherty (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 18 / 2nd Half: 16
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
100%

3W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
71%

5W / 7 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
34.8

League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 41.3

37.8

League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 46.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.58

Actual: 3.4 | Diff: +0.82

0.99

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.21

Adjusted Power Rating
69.2

Attack: 84.8, Defense: 59.4, Form: 67.8

28.4

Attack: 35.1, Defense: 14.6, Form: 8.8

Goal Timing Analysis

6

0-15'

1
6

16-30'

1
6

31-45'

2
7

46-60'

3
5

61-75'

4

76-90+'

5
Clydebank
Broxburn Ath.
Clydebank

Power Rating Breakdown

69.2

Overall

Attack 84.8
Defense 59.4
Form 67.8
Consistency 56.8
Broxburn Ath.

Power Rating Breakdown

28.4

Overall

Attack 35.1
Defense 14.6
Form 8.8
Consistency 77.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

25.0 vs 25.0

Opponent Quality

41.3 vs 46.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Clydebank logo Clydebank
W
Braves (43%)
L
Linlithgow (67%)
W
Broxburn Ath. (26%)
W
Cowdenbeath (36%)
W
Albion (48%)
W
Hearts (29%)
W
East Stirling (32%)
W
Bonnyrigg RA (40%)
Broxburn Ath. logo Broxburn Ath.
L
Tranent (55%)
D
Bonnyrigg RA (40%)
L
Clydebank (63%)
D
Cumbernauld C. (55%)
L
Linlithgow (62%)
D
Braves (48%)
D
Strollers (26%)
L
Tranent (50%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Braves H
2 - 0 W
43%
Linlithgow A
1 - 4 L
67%
Broxburn Ath. H
4 - 0 W
26%
Cowdenbeath A
4 - 0 W
36%
Albion A
1 - 0 W
48%
Hearts A
8 - 0 W
29%
East Stirling A
6 - 0 W
32%
Bonnyrigg RA H
5 - 1 W
40%
Berwick A
2 - 1 W
52%
Celtic A
1 - 3 L
40%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Tranent A
0 - 3 L
55%
Bonnyrigg RA H
2 - 2 D
40%
Clydebank A
0 - 4 L
63%
Cumbernauld C. H
3 - 3 D
55%
Linlithgow H
1 - 6 L
62%
Braves A
1 - 1 D
48%
Strollers H
2 - 2 D
26%
Tranent H
1 - 3 L
50%
Hearts A
1 - 0 W
29%
Celtic H
1 - 1 D
35%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 34.8 vs 37.8), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Clydebank's attack is on another level, averaging 3.4 goals per match with N. McLaughlin leading the charge with 10 goals. Broxburn Ath. manages just 1.2 per match.

Defensively, Clydebank is far superior, conceding just 0.9 goals per match with 6 clean sheets, while Broxburn Ath. leaks 2.5 per match.

Clydebank has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Broxburn Ath. has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

The home advantage factor favors Clydebank, who boasts a 100% home win rate. Playing in front of their fans could be the decisive factor.

Clydebank is a strong road team with a 71% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 4.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Based on our comprehensive analysis including opponent quality adjustment, Clydebank is the clear and decisive favorite. Their superiority across attack (84.8), defense (59.4), and form (67.8) leaves little room for doubt. Broxburn Ath. will need an exceptional performance to compete.

In their recent Highland / Lowland match (2026-04-04), Clydebank prevailed 4-0 against Broxburn Ath.. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Clydebank secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 4-0 scoreline was emphatic — Clydebank completely dominated Broxburn Ath. in that encounter, raising serious questions about Broxburn Ath.'s ability to compete at this level. Broxburn Ath. will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Clydebank will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Clydebank

Clydebank

VS
Broxburn Ath.

Broxburn Ath.

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Clydebank

8W 0D 2L · 34 goals scored · 9 conceded

Broxburn Ath.

1W 5D 4L · 12 goals scored · 25 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or