Skip to content
Compare Crusaders vs Cliftonville

Crusaders vs Cliftonville Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Crusaders vs Cliftonville: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Crusaders Crusaders Home Team
Cliftonville Cliftonville Away Team
Crusaders
49.8
W W L W D L W D L W

Last 10 Matches

Cliftonville
59.7
L W W L W W W L W W

Performance Radar

Crusaders
Cliftonville

Categories Won

2

Crusaders

4

Draw

9

Cliftonville

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 2D, 3L

70%

7W, 0D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+4

+4

+8

+8

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Brooks (3 goals)
L. McStravick (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
57%

4W / 7 matches

71%

5W / 7 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

1W / 3 matches

67%

2W / 3 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
43.4

League Difficulty: 44.1, Opponent Quality: 42.9

46.1

League Difficulty: 43.2, Opponent Quality: 48.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.51

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.09

1.5

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.1

Adjusted Power Rating
49.8

Attack: 49.8, Defense: 56.0, Form: 46.7

59.7

Attack: 51.3, Defense: 70.5, Form: 67.3

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

2
2

31-45'

1
3

46-60'

2
1

61-75'

1
2

76-90+'

1
Crusaders
Cliftonville
Crusaders

Power Rating Breakdown

49.8

Overall

Attack 49.8
Defense 56.0
Form 46.7
Consistency 45.7
Cliftonville

Power Rating Breakdown

59.7

Overall

Attack 51.3
Defense 70.5
Form 67.3
Consistency 43.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

44.1 vs 43.2

Opponent Quality

42.9 vs 48.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Crusaders logo Crusaders
W
Portadown (42%)
W
Ballymena Utd (50%)
L
Cliftonville (60%)
W
Dundela (37%)
D
Newington (40%)
L
Moyola Park (38%)
W
Glenavon (34%)
D
Ballinamallard (40%)
Cliftonville logo Cliftonville
L
Linfield (53%)
W
Bangor (49%)
W
Crusaders (50%)
L
Alvechurch (48%)
W
Warrenpoint (42%)
W
Newington (40%)
W
Moyola Park (36%)
L
Dungannon (55%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Portadown H
3 - 2 W
42%
Ballymena Utd H
2 - 1 W
50%
Cliftonville A
1 - 2 L
60%
Dundela H
2 - 0 W
37%
Newington H
1 - 1 D
40%
Moyola Park A
1 - 2 L
38%
Glenavon H
2 - 0 W
34%
Ballinamallard H
0 - 0 D
40%
Annagh Utd H
1 - 2 L
43%
Annagh Utd A
3 - 2 W
45%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Linfield A
0 - 1 L
53%
Bangor A
3 - 0 W
49%
Crusaders H
2 - 1 W
50%
Alvechurch H
1 - 2 L
48%
Warrenpoint H
2 - 1 W
42%
Newington H
1 - 0 W
40%
Moyola Park H
3 - 0 W
36%
Dungannon H
1 - 2 L
55%
Linfield A
2 - 1 W
53%
Dungannon H
1 - 0 W
55%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 43.4 vs 46.1), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

Crusaders (1.6 goals per match) and Cliftonville (1.6 goals per match) present comparable offensive threats, making this an evenly contested attacking matchup.

Cliftonville has the defensive edge, conceding 0.8 per match compared to Crusaders's 1.2.

Crusaders has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Cliftonville has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Cliftonville is a strong road performer with a 67% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

📈 Form Momentum: Crusaders has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

🔥 Form Momentum: Cliftonville is in scorching form, winning 7 of their last 10 matches with 16 goals scored. This level of consistency is difficult to sustain but devastating while it lasts.

💡 Why This Matters: The 9.9-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 75% win probability for Cliftonville. In practical terms, Cliftonville would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward Cliftonville, with a 9.9-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

In their recent Irish Premiership match (2026-08-07), Cliftonville prevailed 2-1 against Crusaders. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Cliftonville secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 2-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Crusaders will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Cliftonville will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Crusaders

Crusaders

VS
Cliftonville

Cliftonville

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Crusaders

5W 2D 3L · 16 goals scored · 12 conceded

Cliftonville

7W 0D 3L · 16 goals scored · 8 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or