C Palace vs Chelsea Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare C Palace vs Chelsea: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
C Palace
Home Team
Chelsea
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
C Palace
Draw
Chelsea
Statistical Comparison
4W, 2D, 4L
4W, 2D, 4L
16 / 10 matches
20 / 10 matches
17 / 10 matches
16 / 10 matches
-1
+4
1 / 10 matches
1 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
3W / 5 matches
4W / 7 matches
1W / 5 matches
0W / 3 matches
League Difficulty: 74.8, Opponent Quality: 61.4
League Difficulty: 60.9, Opponent Quality: 55.6
0W / 4 matches
1W / 3 matches
Actual: 1.6 | Diff: -0.03
Actual: 2.0 | Diff: +0.09
Attack: 54.1, Defense: 43.9, Form: 40.6
Attack: 68.1, Defense: 47.6, Form: 40.8
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
C Palace
Chelsea
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 51.4 vs 52.1), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.
Chelsea leads the attacking statistics, averaging 2.0 goals per game compared to C Palace's 1.6 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
The defensive records are closely aligned, with C Palace giving up 1.7 and Chelsea giving up 1.6 per fixture.
C Palace has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Chelsea has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.5 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Chelsea faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.6 goals per match. If C Palace can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 5.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 63% win probability for Chelsea. In practical terms, Chelsea would win 6 out of 10 such matchups.
Chelsea has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 5.2-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
C Palace
Chelsea
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
C Palace
4W 2D 4L · 16 goals scored · 17 conceded
Chelsea
4W 2D 4L · 20 goals scored · 16 conceded
Popular Teams