Skip to content
Compare C Palace vs Zrinjski

C Palace vs Zrinjski Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare C Palace vs Zrinjski: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

C Palace C Palace Home Team
Zrinjski Zrinjski Away Team
C Palace
46.1
L W W L W W L D L D

Last 10 Matches

Zrinjski
48.0
D L W W L D D L

Performance Radar

C Palace
Zrinjski

Categories Won

7

C Palace

3

Draw

5

Zrinjski

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

25%

2W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.6

13 / 8 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.1

9 / 8 matches

Goal Difference
-1

-1

+4

+4

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

12%

1 / 8 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

38%

3 / 8 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

4 / 8 matches

Top Scorer
J. Mateta (3 goals)
N. Cvetković (1 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 14
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 12
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
51.4

League Difficulty: 74.8, Opponent Quality: 61.4

49.5

League Difficulty: 69.8, Opponent Quality: 61.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.63

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: -0.03

1.69

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: -0.07

Adjusted Power Rating
46.1

Attack: 54.1, Defense: 43.9, Form: 40.6

48.0

Attack: 53.1, Defense: 63.0, Form: 24.9

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1

16-30'

1

31-45'

2

46-60'

1

61-75'

1
2

76-90+'

1
C Palace
Zrinjski
C Palace

Power Rating Breakdown

46.1

Overall

Attack 54.1
Defense 43.9
Form 40.6
Consistency 44.8
Zrinjski

Power Rating Breakdown

48.0

Overall

Attack 53.1
Defense 63.0
Form 24.9
Consistency 59.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

74.8 vs 69.8

Opponent Quality

61.4 vs 61.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
C Palace logo C Palace
L
Everton (73%)
W
Fulham (48%)
W
Ula (43%)
L
Bromley (48%)
W
Swindon (36%)
W
Rayo (56%)
L
Arsenal (78%)
D
Brentford (81%)
Zrinjski logo Zrinjski
D
Valur (66%)
L
Valur (68%)
W
Posušje (42%)
W
Arsenal (42%)
L
C Palace (63%)
D
C Palace (58%)
D
Rapid Vienna (85%)
L
Raków (69%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Everton A
0 - 2 L
73%
Fulham A
2 - 1 W
48%
Ula H
3 - 1 W
43%
Bromley A
0 - 3 L
48%
Swindon H
5 - 1 W
36%
Rayo H
1 - 0 W
56%
Arsenal H
1 - 2 L
78%
Brentford A
2 - 2 D
81%
Man City A
0 - 3 L
83%
Everton H
2 - 2 D
68%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Valur H
2 - 2 D
66%
Valur A
0 - 1 L
68%
Posušje H
3 - 1 W
42%
Arsenal H
6 - 0 W
42%
C Palace A
0 - 2 L
63%
C Palace H
1 - 1 D
58%
Rapid Vienna H
1 - 1 D
85%
Raków A
0 - 1 L
69%

AI Analysis

Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 51.4 vs 49.5), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

The attacking output of C Palace and Zrinjski is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 1.6 and 1.6 goals per game respectively.

Zrinjski has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to C Palace's 1.7.

C Palace has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

❄️ Form Momentum: Zrinjski is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 8 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.

💡 Why This Matters: C Palace's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

Statistically, there is very little to choose between these two teams. The numbers point to an evenly contested match where fine details and in-game decisions will likely prove decisive.

These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. In their recent UEFA Conference League encounter (2026-02-26), C Palace came out on top with a 2-0 victory over Zrinjski. European competition results carry significant weight in assessing the balance of power between these sides. C Palace secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. Zrinjski will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. C Palace will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost. These two teams drew 1-1 in the UEFA Conference League (2026-02-19). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

C Palace

C Palace

VS
Zrinjski

Zrinjski

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

C Palace

4W 2D 4L · 16 goals scored · 17 conceded

Zrinjski

2W 3D 3L · 13 goals scored · 9 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or