Curaçao vs China Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Curaçao vs China: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Curaçao
Home Team
China
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Curaçao
Draw
China
Statistical Comparison
2W, 3D, 5L
3W, 1D, 2L
15 / 10 matches
5 / 6 matches
21 / 10 matches
4 / 6 matches
-6
+1
4 / 10 matches
3 / 6 matches
5 / 10 matches
1 / 6 matches
4 / 10 matches
1 / 6 matches
1W / 3 matches
2W / 3 matches
1W / 7 matches
1W / 3 matches
League Difficulty: 71.0, Opponent Quality: 62.1
League Difficulty: 75.0, Opponent Quality: 62.7
0W / 4 matches
1W / 3 matches
Actual: 1.5 | Diff: +0.01
Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.04
Attack: 50.0, Defense: 30.0, Form: 20.0
Attack: 29.4, Defense: 84.5, Form: 55.1
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Curaçao
China
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.
China has earned their numbers the hard way, posting a SoS of 60.2 against considerably stronger competition than Curaçao (SoS: 50.1). Their figures deserve greater analytical credence as a result — forged against genuinely difficult opponents.
Curaçao leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.5 goals per game compared to China's 0.8 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
China holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 0.7 goals per game and recording 3 clean sheets, compared to Curaçao's leaky backline that surrenders 2.1 goals per match.
Curaçao has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
China has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.6 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking unlikely given current form.
❄️ Form Momentum: Curaçao is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
💡 Why This Matters: The 15.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for China. In practical terms, China would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers point firmly toward China in this contest. Their superior power rating of 53.0, compared to 37.7 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.
In their recent Internationals match (2026-03-27), China prevailed 2-0 against Curaçao. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. China secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. Curaçao will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. China will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Curaçao
China
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Curaçao
2W 3D 5L · 15 goals scored · 21 conceded
China
3W 1D 2L · 5 goals scored · 4 conceded
Popular Teams