Skip to content
Compare Curaçao vs China

Curaçao vs China Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Curaçao vs China: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Curaçao Curaçao Home Team
China China Away Team
Curaçao
37.7
L D L W L L L D W D

Last 10 Matches

China
53.0
D W L W W L

Performance Radar

Curaçao
China

Categories Won

4

Curaçao

2

Draw

9

China

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

50%

3W, 1D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

0.8

5 / 6 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.1

21 / 10 matches

0.7

4 / 6 matches

Goal Difference
-6

-6

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

3 / 6 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

17%

1 / 6 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

17%

1 / 6 matches

Top Scorer
L. Comenencia (2 goals)
Zhang Yuning (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 2
Home Win Rate
33%

1W / 3 matches

67%

2W / 3 matches

Away Win Rate
14%

1W / 7 matches

33%

1W / 3 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
50.1

League Difficulty: 71.0, Opponent Quality: 62.1

60.2

League Difficulty: 75.0, Opponent Quality: 62.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 4 matches

33%

1W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.49

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: +0.01

0.87

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.04

Adjusted Power Rating
37.7

Attack: 50.0, Defense: 30.0, Form: 20.0

53.0

Attack: 29.4, Defense: 84.5, Form: 55.1

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

3

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

1
4

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

4

76-90+'

1
Curaçao
China
Curaçao

Power Rating Breakdown

37.7

Overall

Attack 50.0
Defense 30.0
Form 20.0
Consistency 61.3
China

Power Rating Breakdown

53.0

Overall

Attack 29.4
Defense 84.5
Form 55.1
Consistency 43.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

71.0 vs 75.0

Opponent Quality

62.1 vs 62.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 33%
Curaçao logo Curaçao
L
Ivory Coast (74%)
D
Ecuador (72%)
L
Germany (89%)
W
Aruba (68%)
L
Scotland (66%)
L
Australia (63%)
L
China (73%)
D
Jamaica (51%)
China logo China
D
Thailand (77%)
W
Singapore (71%)
L
Cameroon (70%)
W
Curaçao (52%)
W
Bahrain (43%)
L
Indonesia (63%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Ivory Coast H
0 - 2 L
74%
Ecuador A
0 - 0 D
72%
Germany A
1 - 7 L
89%
Aruba H
4 - 0 W
68%
Scotland A
1 - 4 L
66%
Australia A
1 - 5 L
63%
China A
0 - 2 L
73%
Jamaica A
0 - 0 D
51%
Bermuda A
7 - 0 W
33%
Trinidad H
1 - 1 D
32%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Thailand H
0 - 0 D
77%
Singapore A
2 - 1 W
71%
Cameroon A
0 - 2 L
70%
Curaçao H
2 - 0 W
52%
Bahrain H
1 - 0 W
43%
Indonesia A
0 - 1 L
63%

AI Analysis

Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.

China has earned their numbers the hard way, posting a SoS of 60.2 against considerably stronger competition than Curaçao (SoS: 50.1). Their figures deserve greater analytical credence as a result — forged against genuinely difficult opponents.

Curaçao leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.5 goals per game compared to China's 0.8 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

China holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 0.7 goals per game and recording 3 clean sheets, compared to Curaçao's leaky backline that surrenders 2.1 goals per match.

Curaçao has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

China has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.6 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking unlikely given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: Curaçao is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

💡 Why This Matters: The 15.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for China. In practical terms, China would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers point firmly toward China in this contest. Their superior power rating of 53.0, compared to 37.7 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.

In their recent Internationals match (2026-03-27), China prevailed 2-0 against Curaçao. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. China secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. Curaçao will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. China will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Curaçao

Curaçao

VS
China

China

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Curaçao

2W 3D 5L · 15 goals scored · 21 conceded

China

3W 1D 2L · 5 goals scored · 4 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or