Skip to content
Compare Dender vs KFUM

Dender vs KFUM Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Dender vs KFUM: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Dender Dender Home Team
KFUM KFUM Away Team
Dender
31.6
D L L W L L L W L L

Last 10 Matches

KFUM
32.8
D W L L D W L D L L

Performance Radar

Dender
KFUM

Categories Won

5

Dender

4

Draw

6

KFUM

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 1D, 7L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-9

-9

-7

-7

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Berte (2 goals)
T. Haltvik (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 3
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
41.0

League Difficulty: 56.6, Opponent Quality: 52.6

37.8

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 50.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.96

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.04

0.79

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.21

Adjusted Power Rating
31.6

Attack: 30.3, Defense: 33.4, Form: 18.2

32.8

Attack: 29.3, Defense: 38.0, Form: 17.6

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

3
3

31-45'

2
2

46-60'

2
1

61-75'

1
2

76-90+'

Dender
KFUM
Dender

Power Rating Breakdown

31.6

Overall

Attack 30.3
Defense 33.4
Form 18.2
Consistency 57.7
KFUM

Power Rating Breakdown

32.8

Overall

Attack 29.3
Defense 38.0
Form 17.6
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

56.6 vs 50.0

Opponent Quality

52.6 vs 50.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Dender logo Dender
D
Lommel (47%)
L
Lommel (48%)
L
ZW (59%)
W
La Louvière (38%)
L
Cercle Brugge (51%)
L
Cercle Brugge (46%)
L
ZW (65%)
W
La Louvière (54%)
KFUM logo KFUM
D
Tromsø (50%)
W
Rosenborg (39%)
L
Brann (54%)
L
Viking (71%)
D
Vålerenga (47%)
W
Sarpsborg (42%)
L
HamKam (57%)
D
Aalesund (50%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Lommel H
0 - 0 D
47%
Lommel A
2 - 3 L
48%
ZW A
1 - 2 L
59%
La Louvière H
2 - 1 W
38%
Cercle Brugge A
1 - 2 L
51%
Cercle Brugge H
1 - 4 L
46%
ZW H
1 - 2 L
65%
La Louvière A
1 - 0 W
54%
Gent H
1 - 3 L
46%
R. Union SG A
0 - 2 L
72%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Tromsø H
0 - 0 D
50%
Rosenborg H
2 - 0 W
39%
Brann A
1 - 2 L
54%
Viking H
0 - 2 L
71%
Vålerenga A
2 - 2 D
47%
Sarpsborg H
1 - 0 W
42%
HamKam A
0 - 4 L
57%
Aalesund A
2 - 2 D
50%
Sandefjord H
1 - 2 L
47%
Fredrikstad A
1 - 3 L
52%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 41.0 vs 37.8), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Dender averaging 1.0 and KFUM averaging 1.0 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Dender conceding 1.9 and KFUM conceding 1.7 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Dender

Dender

VS
KFUM

KFUM

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Dender

2W 1D 7L · 10 goals scored · 19 conceded

KFUM

2W 3D 5L · 10 goals scored · 17 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or