Skip to content
Compare Eastbourne vs Chelmsford

Eastbourne vs Chelmsford Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Eastbourne vs Chelmsford: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Eastbourne Eastbourne Home Team
Chelmsford Chelmsford Away Team
Eastbourne
31.0
L W L L D L D L L L

Last 10 Matches

Chelmsford
41.2
L W D D D W D W L L

Performance Radar

Eastbourne
Chelmsford

Categories Won

3

Eastbourne

2

Draw

10

Chelmsford

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 2D, 7L

30%

3W, 4D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.5

25 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-10

-10

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
90%

9 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Quevin Castro (3 goals)
L. Taylor (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
39.3

League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 44.5

35.9

League Difficulty: 30.0, Opponent Quality: 39.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.37

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: +0.13

1.57

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.23

Adjusted Power Rating
31.0

Attack: 44.6, Defense: 14.9, Form: 8.9

41.2

Attack: 51.5, Defense: 37.2, Form: 25.8

Goal Timing Analysis

5

0-15'

3
1

16-30'

2
3

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

3

61-75'

2
2

76-90+'

7
Eastbourne
Chelmsford
Eastbourne

Power Rating Breakdown

31.0

Overall

Attack 44.6
Defense 14.9
Form 8.9
Consistency 74.5
Chelmsford

Power Rating Breakdown

41.2

Overall

Attack 51.5
Defense 37.2
Form 25.8
Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

31.5 vs 30.0

Opponent Quality

44.5 vs 39.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Eastbourne logo Eastbourne
L
Tonbridge (53%)
W
Chelmsford (45%)
L
Totton (38%)
L
Hemel H (45%)
D
Tonbridge (42%)
L
Worthing (60%)
D
Bath (33%)
L
Chippenham (43%)
Chelmsford logo Chelmsford
L
Eastbourne (24%)
W
Chesham (48%)
D
Hornchurch (55%)
D
Maidenhead (43%)
D
Dag & Red (42%)
W
Enfield T (38%)
D
Totton (38%)
W
Chippenham (43%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Tonbridge A
2 - 4 L
53%
Chelmsford A
3 - 1 W
45%
Totton H
2 - 3 L
38%
Hemel H A
1 - 3 L
45%
Tonbridge H
1 - 1 D
42%
Worthing A
1 - 2 L
60%
Bath H
2 - 2 D
33%
Chippenham A
2 - 5 L
43%
Maidenhead H
0 - 1 L
43%
Ebbsfleet H
1 - 3 L
43%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Eastbourne H
1 - 3 L
24%
Chesham A
2 - 0 W
48%
Hornchurch A
3 - 3 D
55%
Maidenhead H
1 - 1 D
43%
Dag & Red A
3 - 3 D
42%
Enfield T H
3 - 0 W
38%
Totton H
1 - 1 D
38%
Chippenham A
1 - 0 W
43%
Farnborough A
2 - 4 L
48%
Dover H
1 - 2 L
20%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 39.3 vs 35.9), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

Chelmsford holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus Eastbourne's 1.5, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for Chelmsford — 1.7 goals conceded per game and 3 clean sheets put them well ahead of Eastbourne, who give up 2.5 goals per match at the other end.

Eastbourne has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Chelmsford has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 3.8 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

❄️ Form Momentum: Eastbourne is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Chelmsford faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.7 goals per match. If Eastbourne can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 10.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 76% win probability for Chelmsford. In practical terms, Chelmsford would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Chelmsford has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 10.2-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

In their recent National League N / S match (2026-04-25), Eastbourne prevailed 1-3 against Chelmsford. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, Eastbourne achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Chelmsford shows genuine quality and mental strength. Chelmsford will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Eastbourne will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Eastbourne

Eastbourne

VS
Chelmsford

Chelmsford

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Eastbourne

1W 2D 7L · 15 goals scored · 25 conceded

Chelmsford

3W 4D 3L · 18 goals scored · 17 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or