Skip to content
Compare Elgin vs Forfar

Elgin vs Forfar Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Elgin vs Forfar: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Elgin Elgin Home Team
Forfar Forfar Away Team
Elgin
27.9
L L L L L D D L L W

Last 10 Matches

Forfar
40.1
W L L L L D W W W W

Performance Radar

Elgin
Forfar

Categories Won

0

Elgin

4

Draw

11

Forfar

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 2D, 7L

50%

5W, 1D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.1

21 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-13

-13

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Hester (3 goals)
S. Shepherd (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 3
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
40.6

League Difficulty: 37.2, Opponent Quality: 42.8

41.9

League Difficulty: 38.5, Opponent Quality: 44.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.52

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.28

1.13

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: +0.27

Adjusted Power Rating
27.9

Attack: 24.2, Defense: 27.2, Form: 9.1

40.1

Attack: 42.9, Defense: 30.6, Form: 46.0

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2
2

16-30'

3
2

31-45'

3

46-60'

3

61-75'

2

76-90+'

4
Elgin
Forfar
Elgin

Power Rating Breakdown

27.9

Overall

Attack 24.2
Defense 27.2
Form 9.1
Consistency 74.5
Forfar

Power Rating Breakdown

40.1

Overall

Attack 42.9
Defense 30.6
Form 46.0
Consistency 38.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

37.2 vs 38.5

Opponent Quality

42.8 vs 44.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Elgin logo Elgin
L
Hamilton (63%)
L
Kilmarnock (60%)
L
Peterhead (36%)
L
Raith Rovers (56%)
L
Stranraer (32%)
D
Spartans (37%)
D
Stirling (38%)
L
Annan (24%)
Forfar logo Forfar
W
Brechin (36%)
L
Livingston (53%)
L
Partick (54%)
L
Hamilton (63%)
L
Hamilton (58%)
D
Annan (29%)
W
Edinburgh City (36%)
W
Stranraer (37%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Hamilton A
0 - 5 L
63%
Kilmarnock H
0 - 1 L
60%
Peterhead H
1 - 3 L
36%
Raith Rovers A
1 - 3 L
56%
Stranraer H
0 - 1 L
32%
Spartans A
1 - 1 D
37%
Stirling A
2 - 2 D
38%
Annan H
0 - 3 L
24%
Forfar A
1 - 2 L
44%
Clyde H
2 - 0 W
38%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Brechin H
3 - 1 W
36%
Livingston A
0 - 8 L
53%
Partick H
0 - 4 L
54%
Hamilton A
1 - 2 L
63%
Hamilton H
1 - 3 L
58%
Annan A
1 - 1 D
29%
Edinburgh City H
4 - 0 W
36%
Stranraer A
1 - 0 W
37%
East Kilbride H
1 - 0 W
52%
Elgin H
2 - 1 W
23%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 40.6 vs 41.9), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Forfar holds the attacking edge with 1.4 goals per match versus Elgin's 0.8, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Elgin conceding 2.1 and Forfar conceding 2.0 per match.

Elgin has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Forfar has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 3.2 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at possible based on both sides' scoring records.

❄️ Form Momentum: Elgin is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📈 Form Momentum: Forfar has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Forfar is on the rise with 5W in last 10, while Elgin shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Forfar faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 2.0 goals per match. If Elgin can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 12.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 80% win probability for Forfar. In practical terms, Forfar would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

While Forfar holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 12.2-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

In their recent Scottish League Two match (2026-04-04), Forfar prevailed 2-1 against Elgin. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Forfar secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 2-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Elgin will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Forfar will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Elgin

Elgin

VS
Forfar

Forfar

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Elgin

1W 2D 7L · 8 goals scored · 21 conceded

Forfar

5W 1D 4L · 14 goals scored · 20 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or