Skip to content
Compare Finland vs New Zealand

Finland vs New Zealand Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Finland vs New Zealand: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Finland Finland Home Team
New Zealand New Zealand Away Team
Finland
39.3
L L D W W L L W L L

Last 10 Matches

New Zealand
31.3
L L D L L W L L L D

Performance Radar

Finland
New Zealand

Categories Won

8

Finland

4

Draw

3

New Zealand

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 1D, 6L

10%

1W, 2D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

2.3

23 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-6

-6

-13

-13

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
B. Källman (2 goals)
E. Just (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
67%

2W / 3 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
14%

1W / 7 matches

0%

0W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
55.2

League Difficulty: 82.0, Opponent Quality: 64.0

56.7

League Difficulty: 81.5, Opponent Quality: 68.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 6 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.32

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.22

1.32

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.32

Adjusted Power Rating
39.3

Attack: 38.6, Defense: 45.6, Form: 31.6

31.3

Attack: 35.6, Defense: 24.9, Form: 10.7

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

2
3

16-30'

31-45'

2
3

46-60'

3
2

61-75'

1
3

76-90+'

2
Finland
New Zealand
Finland

Power Rating Breakdown

39.3

Overall

Attack 38.6
Defense 45.6
Form 31.6
Consistency 46.0
New Zealand

Power Rating Breakdown

31.3

Overall

Attack 35.6
Defense 24.9
Form 10.7
Consistency 74.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

82.0 vs 81.5

Opponent Quality

64.0 vs 68.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Finland logo Finland
L
Hungary (72%)
L
Germany (87%)
D
Cape Verde (66%)
W
New Zealand (48%)
W
Andorra (46%)
L
Malta (52%)
L
Netherlands (79%)
W
Lithuania (46%)
New Zealand logo New Zealand
L
Belgium (79%)
L
Egypt (66%)
D
Iran (77%)
L
England (83%)
L
Haiti (57%)
W
Chile (60%)
L
Finland (51%)
L
Ecuador (70%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Hungary A
1 - 2 L
72%
Germany A
0 - 4 L
87%
Cape Verde A
1 - 1 D
66%
New Zealand A
2 - 0 W
48%
Andorra H
4 - 0 W
46%
Malta H
0 - 1 L
52%
Netherlands A
0 - 4 L
79%
Lithuania H
2 - 1 W
46%
Poland A
1 - 3 L
74%
Norway A
0 - 1 L
70%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Belgium H
1 - 5 L
79%
Egypt H
1 - 3 L
66%
Iran A
2 - 2 D
77%
England A
0 - 1 L
83%
Haiti A
0 - 4 L
57%
Chile H
4 - 1 W
60%
Finland H
0 - 2 L
51%
Ecuador A
0 - 2 L
70%
Colombia A
1 - 2 L
76%
Norway A
1 - 1 D
70%

AI Analysis

While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 55.2 vs 56.7), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Finland averaging 1.1 and New Zealand averaging 1.0 goals per match.

Finland has the defensive edge, conceding 1.7 per match compared to New Zealand's 2.3.

Finland has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

New Zealand has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 6 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.

❄️ Form Momentum: New Zealand is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Finland faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.7 goals per match. If New Zealand can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 8.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 70% win probability for Finland. In practical terms, Finland would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

While Finland holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 8.0-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

In their recent Internationals match (2026-03-27), Finland prevailed 0-2 against New Zealand. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, Finland achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against New Zealand shows genuine quality and mental strength. New Zealand will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Finland will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Finland

Finland

VS
New Zealand

New Zealand

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Finland

3W 1D 6L · 11 goals scored · 17 conceded

New Zealand

1W 2D 7L · 10 goals scored · 23 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or