Finland vs New Zealand Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Finland vs New Zealand: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Finland
Home Team
New Zealand
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Finland
Draw
New Zealand
Statistical Comparison
3W, 1D, 6L
1W, 2D, 7L
11 / 10 matches
10 / 10 matches
17 / 10 matches
23 / 10 matches
-6
-13
2 / 10 matches
0 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
2W / 3 matches
1W / 4 matches
1W / 7 matches
0W / 6 matches
League Difficulty: 82.0, Opponent Quality: 64.0
League Difficulty: 81.5, Opponent Quality: 68.9
0W / 5 matches
0W / 6 matches
Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.22
Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.32
Attack: 38.6, Defense: 45.6, Form: 31.6
Attack: 35.6, Defense: 24.9, Form: 10.7
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Finland
New Zealand
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 55.2 vs 56.7), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Finland averaging 1.1 and New Zealand averaging 1.0 goals per match.
Finland has the defensive edge, conceding 1.7 per match compared to New Zealand's 2.3.
Finland has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
New Zealand has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 6 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.
❄️ Form Momentum: New Zealand is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Finland faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.7 goals per match. If New Zealand can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 8.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 70% win probability for Finland. In practical terms, Finland would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.
While Finland holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 8.0-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.
In their recent Internationals match (2026-03-27), Finland prevailed 0-2 against New Zealand. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, Finland achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against New Zealand shows genuine quality and mental strength. New Zealand will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Finland will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Finland
New Zealand
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Finland
3W 1D 6L · 11 goals scored · 17 conceded
New Zealand
1W 2D 7L · 10 goals scored · 23 conceded
Popular Teams