Skip to content
Compare Fleetwood vs Tranmere

Fleetwood vs Tranmere Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Fleetwood vs Tranmere: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Fleetwood Fleetwood Home Team
Tranmere Tranmere Away Team
Fleetwood
49.4
D W W L D W W D D D

Last 10 Matches

Tranmere
43.4
D W D W D L W L D L

Performance Radar

Fleetwood
Tranmere

Categories Won

9

Fleetwood

2

Draw

4

Tranmere

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 5D, 1L

30%

3W, 4D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.7

7 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+4

+4

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
20%

2 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
C. Evans (3 goals)
N. Smith (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
43%

3W / 7 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

1W / 3 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
44.6

League Difficulty: 42.5, Opponent Quality: 46.0

43.8

League Difficulty: 41.0, Opponent Quality: 45.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.97

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.13

1.24

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.06

Adjusted Power Rating
49.4

Attack: 34.7, Defense: 72.5, Form: 37.8

43.4

Attack: 40.6, Defense: 56.3, Form: 28.1

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

2

31-45'

1
1

46-60'

3
1

61-75'

5

76-90+'

1
Fleetwood
Tranmere
Fleetwood

Power Rating Breakdown

49.4

Overall

Attack 34.7
Defense 72.5
Form 37.8
Consistency 63.7
Tranmere

Power Rating Breakdown

43.4

Overall

Attack 40.6
Defense 56.3
Form 28.1
Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

42.5 vs 41.0

Opponent Quality

46.0 vs 45.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Fleetwood logo Fleetwood
D
Gillingham (38%)
W
Chesterfield (49%)
W
Chesterfield (46%)
L
Hartlepool (50%)
D
Bolton (56%)
W
Huddersfield (50%)
W
Chester (50%)
D
MK Dons (39%)
Tranmere logo Tranmere
D
Port Vale (51%)
W
Shrewsbury (33%)
D
Rochdale (35%)
W
Blackpool (52%)
D
Grimsby (51%)
L
MK Dons (44%)
W
Cheltenham (43%)
L
Bristol R (53%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Gillingham H
0 - 0 D
38%
Chesterfield A
1 - 0 W
49%
Chesterfield H
1 - 0 W
46%
Hartlepool A
0 - 1 L
50%
Bolton H
1 - 1 D
56%
Huddersfield H
2 - 1 W
50%
Chester H
2 - 0 W
50%
MK Dons H
1 - 1 D
39%
Shrewsbury A
2 - 2 D
38%
Chesterfield H
1 - 1 D
44%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Port Vale A
1 - 1 D
51%
Shrewsbury H
2 - 0 W
33%
Rochdale H
2 - 2 D
35%
Blackpool H
2 - 0 W
52%
Grimsby H
1 - 1 D
51%
MK Dons A
0 - 3 L
44%
Cheltenham A
3 - 1 W
43%
Bristol R H
1 - 2 L
53%
Chesterfield A
1 - 1 D
49%
Colchester H
0 - 1 L
45%

AI Analysis

While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 44.6 vs 43.8), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Fleetwood averaging 1.1 and Tranmere averaging 1.3 goals per match.

Defensively, Fleetwood holds the advantage — allowing just 0.7 goals per game against Tranmere's 1.2.

Fleetwood has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Tranmere has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 2.1 goals in this fixture. The data points Under 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: Fleetwood has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: The 6.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 65% win probability for Fleetwood. In practical terms, Fleetwood would win 6 out of 10 such matchups.

Fleetwood has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 6.0-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Fleetwood

Fleetwood

VS
Tranmere

Tranmere

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Fleetwood

4W 5D 1L · 11 goals scored · 7 conceded

Tranmere

3W 4D 3L · 13 goals scored · 12 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or