Skip to content
Compare Forest Green vs Wealdstone

Forest Green vs Wealdstone Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Forest Green vs Wealdstone: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Forest Green Forest Green Home Team
Wealdstone Wealdstone Away Team
Forest Green
53.4
L D W L W L W D W W

Last 10 Matches

Wealdstone
40.1
W L W D L D D L W L

Performance Radar

Forest Green
Wealdstone

Categories Won

10

Forest Green

2

Draw

3

Wealdstone

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 2D, 3L

30%

3W, 3D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
2.3

23 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+8

+8

-2

-2

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. McAllister (5 goals)
O. Olomola (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 18
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
75%

3W / 4 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
42.2

League Difficulty: 38.0, Opponent Quality: 45.0

43.9

League Difficulty: 39.0, Opponent Quality: 47.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.85

Actual: 2.3 | Diff: +0.45

0.95

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.15

Adjusted Power Rating
53.4

Attack: 70.7, Defense: 46.1, Form: 46.1

40.1

Attack: 34.4, Defense: 53.2, Form: 28.2

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

2

31-45'

1
3

46-60'

2
5

61-75'

1
6

76-90+'

3
Forest Green
Wealdstone
Forest Green

Power Rating Breakdown

53.4

Overall

Attack 70.7
Defense 46.1
Form 46.1
Consistency 45.7
Wealdstone

Power Rating Breakdown

40.1

Overall

Attack 34.4
Defense 53.2
Form 28.2
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

38.0 vs 39.0

Opponent Quality

45.0 vs 47.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Forest Green logo Forest Green
L
Cardiff (68%)
D
Bristol R (64%)
W
Merthyr (41%)
L
Boreham Wood (65%)
W
Morecambe (30%)
L
Hartlepool (49%)
W
Braintree (23%)
D
Truro (46%)
Wealdstone logo Wealdstone
W
MK Dons (44%)
L
Chertsey (49%)
W
Hemel H (46%)
D
Southend (52%)
L
Southend (48%)
D
Scunthorpe (38%)
D
Boston (48%)
L
Rochdale (48%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Cardiff A
1 - 5 L
68%
Bristol R H
2 - 2 D
64%
Merthyr A
2 - 1 W
41%
Boreham Wood A
0 - 1 L
65%
Morecambe H
5 - 0 W
30%
Hartlepool A
1 - 2 L
49%
Braintree H
3 - 1 W
23%
Truro A
1 - 1 D
46%
Brackley H
4 - 0 W
29%
Eastleigh A
4 - 2 W
35%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
MK Dons H
2 - 0 W
44%
Chertsey A
0 - 2 L
49%
Hemel H H
1 - 0 W
46%
Southend A
0 - 0 D
52%
Southend A
1 - 2 L
48%
Scunthorpe H
1 - 1 D
38%
Boston H
1 - 1 D
48%
Rochdale A
1 - 2 L
48%
Aldershot H
3 - 0 W
33%
Boreham Wood A
1 - 5 L
65%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (42.2 vs 43.9), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Few sides can match Forest Green in front of goal. Their 2.3 average per fixture tells the story, with K. McAllister driving that output personally responsible for 5 goals this campaign.

The defensive records are closely aligned, with Forest Green giving up 1.5 and Wealdstone giving up 1.3 per fixture.

Forest Green has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Wealdstone has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Forest Green has an exceptional home record with a 75% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.

Statistical modeling projects 3.1 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: Forest Green has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Forest Green faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If Wealdstone can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 13.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 83% win probability for Forest Green. In practical terms, Forest Green would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward Forest Green, with a 13.3-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Forest Green

Forest Green

VS
Wealdstone

Wealdstone

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Forest Green

5W 2D 3L · 23 goals scored · 15 conceded

Wealdstone

3W 3D 4L · 11 goals scored · 13 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or