Forest Green vs Wealdstone Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Forest Green vs Wealdstone: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Forest Green
Home Team
Wealdstone
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Forest Green
Draw
Wealdstone
Statistical Comparison
5W, 2D, 3L
3W, 3D, 4L
23 / 10 matches
11 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
13 / 10 matches
+8
-2
2 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
3W / 4 matches
3W / 5 matches
2W / 6 matches
0W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 38.0, Opponent Quality: 45.0
League Difficulty: 39.0, Opponent Quality: 47.1
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 2.3 | Diff: +0.45
Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.15
Attack: 70.7, Defense: 46.1, Form: 46.1
Attack: 34.4, Defense: 53.2, Form: 28.2
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Forest Green
Wealdstone
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (42.2 vs 43.9), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
Few sides can match Forest Green in front of goal. Their 2.3 average per fixture tells the story, with K. McAllister driving that output personally responsible for 5 goals this campaign.
The defensive records are closely aligned, with Forest Green giving up 1.5 and Wealdstone giving up 1.3 per fixture.
Forest Green has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Wealdstone has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Forest Green has an exceptional home record with a 75% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Statistical modeling projects 3.1 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.
📈 Form Momentum: Forest Green has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Forest Green faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If Wealdstone can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 13.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 83% win probability for Forest Green. In practical terms, Forest Green would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers lean toward Forest Green, with a 13.3-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Forest Green
Wealdstone
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Forest Green
5W 2D 3L · 23 goals scored · 15 conceded
Wealdstone
3W 3D 4L · 11 goals scored · 13 conceded
Popular Teams