Forfar vs Elgin Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Forfar vs Elgin: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Forfar
Home Team
Elgin
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Forfar
Draw
Elgin
Statistical Comparison
5W, 1D, 4L
1W, 2D, 7L
14 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
20 / 10 matches
21 / 10 matches
-6
-13
3 / 10 matches
1 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
4W / 6 matches
1W / 5 matches
1W / 4 matches
0W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 38.5, Opponent Quality: 44.1
League Difficulty: 37.2, Opponent Quality: 42.8
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.4 | Diff: +0.27
Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.28
Attack: 42.9, Defense: 30.6, Form: 46.0
Attack: 24.2, Defense: 27.2, Form: 9.1
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Forfar
Elgin
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 41.9 vs 40.6), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.
Offensively, Forfar outperforms Elgin with 1.4 goals per match to 0.8, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.
Both defenses are comparable, with Forfar conceding 2.0 and Elgin conceding 2.1 per match.
Forfar has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Elgin has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.2 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.
📈 Form Momentum: Forfar has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
❄️ Form Momentum: Elgin is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Forfar is on the rise with 5W in last 10, while Elgin shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Forfar faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 2.0 goals per match. If Elgin can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 12.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 80% win probability for Forfar. In practical terms, Forfar would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Forfar has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 12.2-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.
In their recent Scottish League Two match (2026-04-04), Forfar prevailed 2-1 against Elgin. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Forfar secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 2-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Elgin will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Forfar will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Forfar
Elgin
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Forfar
5W 1D 4L · 14 goals scored · 20 conceded
Elgin
1W 2D 7L · 8 goals scored · 21 conceded
Popular Teams