Skip to content
Compare Fylde vs Radcliffe

Fylde vs Radcliffe Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Fylde vs Radcliffe: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Fylde Fylde Home Team
Radcliffe Radcliffe Away Team
Fylde
51.6
L W L W W W L W L W

Last 10 Matches

Radcliffe
28.9
D D W L L L L D L L

Performance Radar

Fylde
Radcliffe

Categories Won

9

Fylde

3

Draw

3

Radcliffe

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
60%

6W, 0D, 4L

10%

1W, 3D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
2.1

21 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

2.3

23 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+7

+7

-12

-12

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
L. Thomas (5 goals)
R. Clegg (6 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 15
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
38.6

League Difficulty: 36.0, Opponent Quality: 40.3

39.2

League Difficulty: 33.0, Opponent Quality: 43.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.77

Actual: 2.1 | Diff: +0.33

0.73

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.37

Adjusted Power Rating
51.6

Attack: 62.0, Defense: 47.3, Form: 53.2

28.9

Attack: 32.7, Defense: 20.8, Form: 8.9

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2

16-30'

3

31-45'

2
3

46-60'

3
2

61-75'

4
3

76-90+'

2
Fylde
Radcliffe
Fylde

Power Rating Breakdown

51.6

Overall

Attack 62.0
Defense 47.3
Form 53.2
Consistency 35.2
Radcliffe

Power Rating Breakdown

28.9

Overall

Attack 32.7
Defense 20.8
Form 8.9
Consistency 74.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

36.0 vs 33.0

Opponent Quality

40.3 vs 43.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Fylde logo Fylde
L
Wigan (47%)
W
Longridge Town (43%)
L
Huddersfield (48%)
W
Hyde Utd (41%)
W
Merthyr (35%)
W
Southport (44%)
L
Chester (51%)
W
Radcliffe (25%)
Radcliffe logo Radcliffe
D
Barrow (40%)
D
Shrewsbury (40%)
W
Macclesfield (39%)
L
Hereford (45%)
L
Kidderminster (67%)
L
South Shields (42%)
L
Fylde (52%)
D
Curzon Ashton (27%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Wigan H
0 - 3 L
47%
Longridge Town A
3 - 0 W
43%
Huddersfield H
1 - 2 L
48%
Hyde Utd A
3 - 1 W
41%
Merthyr A
4 - 2 W
35%
Southport H
4 - 0 W
44%
Chester A
0 - 1 L
51%
Radcliffe H
4 - 3 W
25%
Chorley A
0 - 2 L
37%
Marine H
2 - 0 W
32%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Barrow H
0 - 0 D
40%
Shrewsbury H
0 - 0 D
40%
Macclesfield H
1 - 0 W
39%
Hereford A
1 - 3 L
45%
Kidderminster H
1 - 3 L
67%
South Shields H
2 - 5 L
42%
Fylde A
3 - 4 L
52%
Curzon Ashton H
3 - 3 D
27%
Worksop A
0 - 2 L
51%
Darlington A
0 - 3 L
30%

AI Analysis

Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 38.6 vs 39.2), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

Fylde possess a formidable attacking unit, with L. Thomas accounting for 5 goals and the squad maintaining an impressive 2.1 goals per game — a threat no opponent can afford to overlook.

Fylde holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 1.4 goals per game and recording 3 clean sheets, compared to Radcliffe's leaky backline that surrenders 2.3 goals per match.

Fylde has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Radcliffe has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Fylde is a strong road performer with a 60% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Statistical modeling projects 3.4 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at possible based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: Fylde has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.8 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

❄️ Form Momentum: Radcliffe is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Fylde is on the rise with 6W in last 10, while Radcliffe shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Fylde faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If Radcliffe can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 22.7-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Fylde. In practical terms, Fylde would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Based on the available data, Fylde holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 51.6 against 28.9 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.

In their recent National League N / S match (2026-04-06), Fylde prevailed 4-3 against Radcliffe. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Fylde secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 4-3 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Radcliffe will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Fylde will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Fylde

Fylde

VS
Radcliffe

Radcliffe

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Fylde

6W 0D 4L · 21 goals scored · 14 conceded

Radcliffe

1W 3D 6L · 11 goals scored · 23 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or