Skip to content
Compare GAK vs KFUM

GAK vs KFUM Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare GAK vs KFUM: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

GAK GAK Home Team
KFUM KFUM Away Team
GAK
60.6
W D W L L D L W W W

Last 10 Matches

KFUM
32.8
D W L L D W L D L L

Performance Radar

GAK
KFUM

Categories Won

10

GAK

5

Draw

0

KFUM

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 2D, 3L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.9

9 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+11

+11

-7

-7

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
R. Harakaté (4 goals)
T. Haltvik (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 13
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 3
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
52.3

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 50.5

37.8

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 50.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.95

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: +0.05

0.79

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.21

Adjusted Power Rating
60.6

Attack: 68.2, Defense: 71.6, Form: 51.2

32.8

Attack: 29.3, Defense: 38.0, Form: 17.6

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2
2

16-30'

3
4

31-45'

2
4

46-60'

2
3

61-75'

1
6

76-90+'

GAK
KFUM
GAK

Power Rating Breakdown

60.6

Overall

Attack 68.2
Defense 71.6
Form 51.2
Consistency 45.7
KFUM

Power Rating Breakdown

32.8

Overall

Attack 29.3
Defense 38.0
Form 17.6
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 50.0

Opponent Quality

50.5 vs 50.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
GAK logo GAK
W
BW Linz (57%)
D
Altach (49%)
W
WSG Tirol (38%)
L
WAC (57%)
L
Ried (54%)
D
Ried (49%)
L
Altach (54%)
W
BW Linz (52%)
KFUM logo KFUM
D
Tromsø (50%)
W
Rosenborg (39%)
L
Brann (54%)
L
Viking (71%)
D
Vålerenga (47%)
W
Sarpsborg (42%)
L
HamKam (57%)
D
Aalesund (50%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
BW Linz A
3 - 0 W
57%
Altach H
2 - 2 D
49%
WSG Tirol H
4 - 0 W
38%
WAC A
0 - 1 L
57%
Ried A
1 - 2 L
54%
Ried H
1 - 1 D
49%
Altach A
0 - 1 L
54%
BW Linz H
2 - 1 W
52%
WSG Tirol A
5 - 1 W
43%
WAC H
2 - 0 W
52%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Tromsø H
0 - 0 D
50%
Rosenborg H
2 - 0 W
39%
Brann A
1 - 2 L
54%
Viking H
0 - 2 L
71%
Vålerenga A
2 - 2 D
47%
Sarpsborg H
1 - 0 W
42%
HamKam A
0 - 4 L
57%
Aalesund A
2 - 2 D
50%
Sandefjord H
1 - 2 L
47%
Fredrikstad A
1 - 3 L
52%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

GAK has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 52.3) compared to KFUM (SoS: 37.8). This means GAK's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

GAK's attack is on another level, averaging 2.0 goals per match with R. Harakaté leading the charge with 4 goals. KFUM manages just 1.0 per match.

GAK has the defensive edge, conceding 0.9 per match compared to KFUM's 1.7.

GAK has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

GAK emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (60.6 vs 32.8) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

GAK

GAK

VS
KFUM

KFUM

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

GAK

5W 2D 3L · 20 goals scored · 9 conceded

KFUM

2W 3D 5L · 10 goals scored · 17 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or