Skip to content
Compare Heidenheim vs NAC

Heidenheim vs NAC Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Heidenheim vs NAC: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Heidenheim Heidenheim Home Team
NAC NAC Away Team
Heidenheim
48.5
L W D W L W D D L L

Last 10 Matches

NAC
31.9
D W L L D D L L D L

Performance Radar

Heidenheim
NAC

Categories Won

12

Heidenheim

2

Draw

1

NAC

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

10%

1W, 4D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

2.2

22 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
0

0

-12

-12

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
B. Zivzivadze (5 goals)
M. Soumano (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
58.9

League Difficulty: 91.0, Opponent Quality: 64.3

54.3

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 63.8

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.45

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.55

1.27

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.27

Adjusted Power Rating
48.5

Attack: 69.0, Defense: 39.9, Form: 32.7

31.9

Attack: 34.8, Defense: 27.8, Form: 10.4

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

3

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

2
2

46-60'

1
4

61-75'

4
5

76-90+'

2
Heidenheim
NAC
Heidenheim

Power Rating Breakdown

48.5

Overall

Attack 69.0
Defense 39.9
Form 32.7
Consistency 53.2
NAC

Power Rating Breakdown

31.9

Overall

Attack 34.8
Defense 27.8
Form 10.4
Consistency 75.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

91.0 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

64.3 vs 63.8

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Heidenheim logo Heidenheim
L
Mainz 05 (65%)
W
Köln (61%)
D
Bayern Munich (86%)
W
St. Pauli (45%)
L
Freiburg (66%)
W
Union Berlin (58%)
D
M'gladbach (70%)
D
Leverkusen (65%)
NAC logo NAC
D
AZ (68%)
W
Heerenveen (65%)
L
Utrecht (77%)
L
Ajax (68%)
D
Fortuna (56%)
D
Sparta (44%)
L
Zwolle (56%)
L
Go Ahead (64%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Mainz 05 H
0 - 2 L
65%
Köln A
3 - 1 W
61%
Bayern Munich A
3 - 3 D
86%
St. Pauli H
2 - 0 W
45%
Freiburg A
1 - 2 L
66%
Union Berlin H
3 - 1 W
58%
M'gladbach A
2 - 2 D
70%
Leverkusen H
3 - 3 D
65%
Frankfurt A
0 - 1 L
64%
Hoffenheim H
2 - 4 L
63%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
AZ A
3 - 3 D
68%
Heerenveen H
2 - 0 W
65%
Utrecht A
0 - 2 L
77%
Ajax H
0 - 2 L
68%
Fortuna A
1 - 1 D
56%
Sparta H
0 - 0 D
44%
Zwolle A
1 - 2 L
56%
Go Ahead A
0 - 6 L
64%
Feyenoord H
3 - 3 D
67%
Telstar A
0 - 3 L
73%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 58.9 vs 54.3), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Heidenheim holds the attacking edge with 1.9 goals per match versus NAC's 1.0, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Heidenheim has the defensive edge, conceding 1.9 per match compared to NAC's 2.2.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.5 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Heidenheim emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (48.5 vs 31.9) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Heidenheim

Heidenheim

VS
NAC

NAC

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Heidenheim

3W 3D 4L · 19 goals scored · 19 conceded

NAC

1W 4D 5L · 10 goals scored · 22 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or