Skip to content
Compare Huddersfield vs Wycombe

Huddersfield vs Wycombe Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Huddersfield vs Wycombe: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Huddersfield Huddersfield Home Team
Wycombe Wycombe Away Team
Huddersfield
49.1
W L L W W L D D D W

Last 10 Matches

Wycombe
46.3
W W L W L L D L L W

Performance Radar

Huddersfield
Wycombe

Categories Won

8

Huddersfield

5

Draw

2

Wycombe

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 3D, 3L

40%

4W, 1D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
2.1

21 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+2

+2

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
90%

9 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
90%

9 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Harness (4 goals)
N. Lowe (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 18
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 15
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
48.4

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 50.6

48.0

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 50.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.82

Actual: 2.1 | Diff: +0.28

1.96

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: +0.04

Adjusted Power Rating
49.1

Attack: 68.9, Defense: 36.1, Form: 39.4

46.3

Attack: 65.3, Defense: 35.9, Form: 39.2

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

2
1

31-45'

1
5

46-60'

1
4

61-75'

2
2

76-90+'

6
Huddersfield
Wycombe
Huddersfield

Power Rating Breakdown

49.1

Overall

Attack 68.9
Defense 36.1
Form 39.4
Consistency 50.5
Wycombe

Power Rating Breakdown

46.3

Overall

Attack 65.3
Defense 35.9
Form 39.2
Consistency 39.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

50.6 vs 50.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Huddersfield logo Huddersfield
W
Oldham (35%)
L
Fleetwood (55%)
L
Sheff Utd (58%)
W
Fylde (58%)
W
Wimbledon (41%)
L
Mansfield (52%)
D
Bolton (60%)
D
Cardiff (63%)
Wycombe logo Wycombe
W
Portsmouth (49%)
W
Yeovil (35%)
L
QPR (50%)
W
Rotherham (37%)
L
Lincoln (66%)
L
Blackpool (52%)
D
Huddersfield (54%)
L
Bradford (45%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Oldham H
3 - 1 W
35%
Fleetwood A
1 - 2 L
55%
Sheff Utd A
1 - 3 L
58%
Fylde A
2 - 1 W
58%
Wimbledon A
4 - 0 W
41%
Mansfield H
1 - 4 L
52%
Bolton A
3 - 3 D
60%
Cardiff H
1 - 1 D
63%
Wycombe H
3 - 3 D
44%
L Orient A
2 - 1 W
40%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Portsmouth H
3 - 1 W
49%
Yeovil H
3 - 2 W
35%
QPR A
0 - 1 L
50%
Rotherham H
3 - 2 W
37%
Lincoln A
3 - 4 L
66%
Blackpool H
0 - 1 L
52%
Huddersfield A
3 - 3 D
54%
Bradford H
1 - 2 L
45%
Stockport A
0 - 3 L
59%
Port Vale H
4 - 0 W
53%

AI Analysis

Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 48.4 vs 48.0), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

The attacking output of Huddersfield and Wycombe is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 2.1 and 2.0 goals per game respectively.

Both defenses are comparable, with Huddersfield conceding 1.9 and Wycombe conceding 1.9 per match.

Huddersfield has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Wycombe has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 4.0 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

📈 Form Momentum: Huddersfield has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.

💡 Why This Matters: Huddersfield's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

Statistically, there is very little to choose between these two teams. The numbers point to an evenly contested match where fine details and in-game decisions will likely prove decisive.

These two teams drew 3-3 in the League One (2026-04-11). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Huddersfield

Huddersfield

VS
Wycombe

Wycombe

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Huddersfield

4W 3D 3L · 21 goals scored · 19 conceded

Wycombe

4W 1D 5L · 20 goals scored · 19 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or