Skip to content
Compare KFUM vs AIK

KFUM vs AIK Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KFUM vs AIK: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KFUM KFUM Home Team
AIK AIK Away Team
KFUM
32.8
D W L L D W L D L L

Last 10 Matches

AIK
41.2
W L W D L D L L W D

Performance Radar

KFUM
AIK

Categories Won

2

KFUM

3

Draw

10

AIK

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

30%

3W, 3D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-7

-7

-4

-4

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Haltvik (3 goals)
J. Hove (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 3
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
37.8

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 50.9

51.8

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 53.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.79

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.21

1.13

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.07

Adjusted Power Rating
32.8

Attack: 29.3, Defense: 38.0, Form: 17.6

41.2

Attack: 40.7, Defense: 47.5, Form: 30.5

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1
3

16-30'

2
2

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

4
1

61-75'

1

76-90+'

3
KFUM
AIK
KFUM

Power Rating Breakdown

32.8

Overall

Attack 29.3
Defense 38.0
Form 17.6
Consistency 61.3
AIK

Power Rating Breakdown

41.2

Overall

Attack 40.7
Defense 47.5
Form 30.5
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

50.0 vs 50.0

Opponent Quality

50.9 vs 53.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
KFUM logo KFUM
D
Tromsø (50%)
W
Rosenborg (39%)
L
Brann (54%)
L
Viking (71%)
D
Vålerenga (47%)
W
Sarpsborg (42%)
L
HamKam (57%)
D
Aalesund (50%)
AIK logo AIK
W
IFK Göteborg (45%)
L
Sirius (69%)
W
Hammarby (62%)
D
Västerås (49%)
L
Djurgården (53%)
D
Elfsborg (56%)
L
Malmö (48%)
L
Degerfors (48%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Tromsø H
0 - 0 D
50%
Rosenborg H
2 - 0 W
39%
Brann A
1 - 2 L
54%
Viking H
0 - 2 L
71%
Vålerenga A
2 - 2 D
47%
Sarpsborg H
1 - 0 W
42%
HamKam A
0 - 4 L
57%
Aalesund A
2 - 2 D
50%
Sandefjord H
1 - 2 L
47%
Fredrikstad A
1 - 3 L
52%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
IFK Göteborg A
2 - 1 W
45%
Sirius H
0 - 3 L
69%
Hammarby A
2 - 1 W
62%
Västerås A
1 - 1 D
49%
Djurgården H
2 - 4 L
53%
Elfsborg A
1 - 1 D
56%
Malmö H
0 - 1 L
48%
Degerfors A
1 - 2 L
48%
Kalmar H
1 - 0 W
46%
Brommapojkarna A
2 - 2 D
54%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

AIK has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 51.8) compared to KFUM (SoS: 37.8). This means AIK's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with KFUM averaging 1.0 and AIK averaging 1.2 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with KFUM conceding 1.7 and AIK conceding 1.6 per match.

AIK has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

AIK has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 8.4 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KFUM

KFUM

VS
AIK

AIK

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

KFUM

2W 3D 5L · 10 goals scored · 17 conceded

AIK

3W 3D 4L · 12 goals scored · 16 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or