Skip to content
Compare KFUM vs Brann

KFUM vs Brann Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KFUM vs Brann: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KFUM KFUM Home Team
Brann Brann Away Team
KFUM
32.8
D W L L D W L D L L

Last 10 Matches

Brann
46.1
L L L W W W D L L W

Performance Radar

KFUM
Brann

Categories Won

1

KFUM

2

Draw

12

Brann

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

40%

4W, 1D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

2.1

21 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-7

-7

+6

+6

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Haltvik (3 goals)
N. Holm (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 3
1st Half: 11 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
37.8

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 50.9

38.3

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 52.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.79

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.21

2.02

Actual: 2.1 | Diff: +0.08

Adjusted Power Rating
32.8

Attack: 29.3, Defense: 38.0, Form: 17.6

46.1

Attack: 61.8, Defense: 44.1, Form: 35.3

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1
3

16-30'

4
2

31-45'

6
2

46-60'

3
1

61-75'

2

76-90+'

5
KFUM
Brann
KFUM

Power Rating Breakdown

32.8

Overall

Attack 29.3
Defense 38.0
Form 17.6
Consistency 61.3
Brann

Power Rating Breakdown

46.1

Overall

Attack 61.8
Defense 44.1
Form 35.3
Consistency 39.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

50.0 vs 50.0

Opponent Quality

50.9 vs 52.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
KFUM logo KFUM
D
Tromsø (50%)
W
Rosenborg (39%)
L
Brann (54%)
L
Viking (71%)
D
Vålerenga (47%)
W
Sarpsborg (42%)
L
HamKam (57%)
D
Aalesund (50%)
Brann logo Brann
L
Sarpsborg (42%)
L
Bodø/Glimt (67%)
L
Aalesund (50%)
W
KFUM (39%)
W
Fredrikstad (47%)
W
Tromsø (55%)
D
Rosenborg (44%)
L
Viking (76%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Tromsø H
0 - 0 D
50%
Rosenborg H
2 - 0 W
39%
Brann A
1 - 2 L
54%
Viking H
0 - 2 L
71%
Vålerenga A
2 - 2 D
47%
Sarpsborg H
1 - 0 W
42%
HamKam A
0 - 4 L
57%
Aalesund A
2 - 2 D
50%
Sandefjord H
1 - 2 L
47%
Fredrikstad A
1 - 3 L
52%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sarpsborg H
1 - 2 L
42%
Bodø/Glimt A
1 - 3 L
67%
Aalesund A
1 - 2 L
50%
KFUM H
2 - 1 W
39%
Fredrikstad H
3 - 1 W
47%
Tromsø A
5 - 0 W
55%
Rosenborg A
1 - 1 D
44%
Viking A
2 - 3 L
76%
Sandefjord H
0 - 1 L
47%
HamKam A
5 - 1 W
57%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 37.8 vs 38.3), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Brann's attack is on another level, averaging 2.1 goals per match with N. Holm leading the charge with 4 goals. KFUM manages just 1.0 per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with KFUM conceding 1.7 and Brann conceding 1.5 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Brann has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 13.3 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

In their recent Norwegian Eliteserien match (2026-05-16), Brann prevailed 2-1 against KFUM. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Brann secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 2-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. KFUM will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Brann will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KFUM

KFUM

VS
Brann

Brann

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

KFUM

2W 3D 5L · 10 goals scored · 17 conceded

Brann

4W 1D 5L · 21 goals scored · 15 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or