KuPS vs Gnistan Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare KuPS vs Gnistan: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
KuPS
Home Team
Gnistan
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
KuPS
Draw
Gnistan
Statistical Comparison
3W, 3D, 4L
5W, 3D, 2L
12 / 10 matches
18 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
13 / 10 matches
-2
+5
1 / 10 matches
1 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
1W / 5 matches
2W / 4 matches
2W / 5 matches
3W / 6 matches
League Difficulty: 66.7, Opponent Quality: 62.3
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.8
0W / 3 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.1
Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.03
Attack: 39.4, Defense: 52.5, Form: 29.6
Attack: 57.7, Defense: 54.5, Form: 48.1
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
KuPS
Gnistan
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 48.5 vs 46.1), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Gnistan holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus KuPS's 1.2, though the gap isn't insurmountable.
Defensively, KuPS and Gnistan are evenly matched, allowing 1.4 and 1.3 goals per game respectively.
KuPS has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Gnistan has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Statistical modeling projects 2.8 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.
📈 Form Momentum: Gnistan has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.8 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Gnistan faces a key vulnerability: they have kept only 1 clean sheets in their last 10 matches. If KuPS can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 11.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 79% win probability for Gnistan. In practical terms, Gnistan would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
While Gnistan holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 11.5-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.
In their recent Finnish Veikkausliiga match (2026-08-01), KuPS prevailed 0-1 against Gnistan. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, KuPS achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Gnistan shows genuine quality and mental strength. The narrow 0-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Gnistan will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. KuPS will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
KuPS
Gnistan
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
KuPS
3W 3D 4L · 12 goals scored · 14 conceded
Gnistan
5W 3D 2L · 18 goals scored · 13 conceded
Popular Teams