Skip to content
Compare KuPS vs Gnistan

KuPS vs Gnistan Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KuPS vs Gnistan: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KuPS KuPS Home Team
Gnistan Gnistan Away Team
KuPS
41.8
L D W L D D W L W L

Last 10 Matches

Gnistan
53.3
W W D L W W W L D D

Performance Radar

KuPS
Gnistan

Categories Won

1

KuPS

4

Draw

10

Gnistan

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

50%

5W, 3D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

+5

+5

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Luyeye-Lutumba (3 goals)
A. Akinyemi (8 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 3
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
48.5

League Difficulty: 66.7, Opponent Quality: 62.3

46.1

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.8

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.3

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.1

1.77

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.03

Adjusted Power Rating
41.8

Attack: 39.4, Defense: 52.5, Form: 29.6

53.3

Attack: 57.7, Defense: 54.5, Form: 48.1

Goal Timing Analysis

6

0-15'

5
3

16-30'

2

31-45'

2
1

46-60'

2
1

61-75'

3
1

76-90+'

4
KuPS
Gnistan
KuPS

Power Rating Breakdown

41.8

Overall

Attack 39.4
Defense 52.5
Form 29.6
Consistency 53.2
Gnistan

Power Rating Breakdown

53.3

Overall

Attack 57.7
Defense 54.5
Form 48.1
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

66.7 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

62.3 vs 46.8

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
KuPS logo KuPS
L
Mariehamn (29%)
D
Shamrock (69%)
W
Lahti (59%)
L
U Craiova (70%)
D
TPS (50%)
D
U Craiova (65%)
W
Gnistan (58%)
L
Sabah (85%)
Gnistan logo Gnistan
W
HJK (60%)
W
Ilves (44%)
D
SJK (44%)
L
KuPS (43%)
W
Inter Turku (58%)
W
Oulu (43%)
W
Mariehamn (29%)
L
Lahti (59%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Mariehamn H
2 - 4 L
29%
Shamrock A
1 - 1 D
69%
Lahti A
2 - 1 W
59%
U Craiova A
1 - 2 L
70%
TPS H
1 - 1 D
50%
U Craiova H
1 - 1 D
65%
Gnistan A
1 - 0 W
58%
Sabah H
0 - 2 L
85%
VPS H
3 - 1 W
50%
Sabah A
0 - 1 L
88%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
HJK A
3 - 2 W
60%
Ilves H
3 - 2 W
44%
SJK A
2 - 2 D
44%
KuPS H
0 - 1 L
43%
Inter Turku A
2 - 1 W
58%
Oulu A
2 - 0 W
43%
Mariehamn H
4 - 2 W
29%
Lahti A
0 - 1 L
59%
VPS H
1 - 1 D
50%
Jaro A
1 - 1 D
38%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 48.5 vs 46.1), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Gnistan holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus KuPS's 1.2, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

Defensively, KuPS and Gnistan are evenly matched, allowing 1.4 and 1.3 goals per game respectively.

KuPS has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Gnistan has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 2.8 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: Gnistan has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.8 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Gnistan faces a key vulnerability: they have kept only 1 clean sheets in their last 10 matches. If KuPS can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 11.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 79% win probability for Gnistan. In practical terms, Gnistan would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

While Gnistan holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 11.5-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

In their recent Finnish Veikkausliiga match (2026-08-01), KuPS prevailed 0-1 against Gnistan. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, KuPS achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Gnistan shows genuine quality and mental strength. The narrow 0-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Gnistan will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. KuPS will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KuPS

KuPS

VS
Gnistan

Gnistan

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

KuPS

3W 3D 4L · 12 goals scored · 14 conceded

Gnistan

5W 3D 2L · 18 goals scored · 13 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or