KuPS vs NAC Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare KuPS vs NAC: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
KuPS
Home Team
NAC
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
KuPS
Draw
NAC
Statistical Comparison
5W, 4D, 1L
1W, 4D, 5L
18 / 10 matches
10 / 10 matches
10 / 10 matches
22 / 10 matches
+8
-12
3 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
3W / 5 matches
1W / 4 matches
2W / 5 matches
0W / 6 matches
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 45.9
League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 63.8
0W / 0 matches
0W / 2 matches
Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.06
Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.27
Attack: 57.3, Defense: 63.7, Form: 47.8
Attack: 34.8, Defense: 27.8, Form: 10.4
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
KuPS
NAC
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 45.5 vs 54.3), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.
KuPS holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus NAC's 1.0, though the gap is not insurmountable.
Defensively, KuPS is far superior, conceding just 1.0 goals per match with 3 clean sheets, while NAC leaks 2.2 per match.
KuPS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.
KuPS emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (56.6 vs 31.9) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
KuPS
NAC
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
KuPS
5W 4D 1L · 18 goals scored · 10 conceded
NAC
1W 4D 5L · 10 goals scored · 22 conceded
Popular Teams