Skip to content
Compare KuPS vs Vardar

KuPS vs Vardar Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KuPS vs Vardar: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KuPS KuPS Home Team
Vardar Vardar Away Team
KuPS
41.8
L D W L D D W L W L

Last 10 Matches

Vardar
35.3
L L W L

Performance Radar

KuPS
Vardar

Categories Won

7

KuPS

2

Draw

6

Vardar

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

25%

1W, 0D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.8

7 / 4 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

3.0

12 / 4 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

-5

-5

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 4 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

75%

3 / 4 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

75%

3 / 4 matches

Top Scorer
J. Luyeye-Lutumba (3 goals)
S. Savolainen (1 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 3
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

50%

1W / 2 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
48.5

League Difficulty: 66.7, Opponent Quality: 62.3

59.5

League Difficulty: 87.5, Opponent Quality: 70.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.3

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.1

2.31

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.56

Adjusted Power Rating
41.8

Attack: 39.4, Defense: 52.5, Form: 29.6

35.3

Attack: 65.7, Defense: 0.0, Form: 27.4

Goal Timing Analysis

6

0-15'

3

16-30'

2

31-45'

1

46-60'

1
1

61-75'

2
1

76-90+'

2
KuPS
Vardar
KuPS

Power Rating Breakdown

41.8

Overall

Attack 39.4
Defense 52.5
Form 29.6
Consistency 53.2
Vardar

Power Rating Breakdown

35.3

Overall

Attack 65.7
Defense 0.0
Form 27.4
Consistency 49.4

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

66.7 vs 87.5

Opponent Quality

62.3 vs 70.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
KuPS logo KuPS
L
Mariehamn (29%)
D
Shamrock (69%)
W
Lahti (59%)
L
U Craiova (70%)
D
TPS (50%)
D
U Craiova (65%)
W
Gnistan (58%)
L
Sabah (85%)
Vardar logo Vardar
L
Riga (75%)
L
Riga (72%)
W
KuPS (69%)
L
KuPS (64%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Mariehamn H
2 - 4 L
29%
Shamrock A
1 - 1 D
69%
Lahti A
2 - 1 W
59%
U Craiova A
1 - 2 L
70%
TPS H
1 - 1 D
50%
U Craiova H
1 - 1 D
65%
Gnistan A
1 - 0 W
58%
Sabah H
0 - 2 L
85%
VPS H
3 - 1 W
50%
Sabah A
0 - 1 L
88%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Riga A
2 - 5 L
75%
Riga H
2 - 3 L
72%
KuPS A
3 - 2 W
69%
KuPS H
0 - 2 L
64%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

Context matters here: Vardar's schedule strength (SoS: 59.5) has been notably more demanding than KuPS's (SoS: 48.5), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.

Offensively, Vardar outperforms KuPS with 1.8 goals per match to 1.2, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.

The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for KuPS — 1.4 goals conceded per game and 1 clean sheets put them well ahead of Vardar, who give up 3.0 goals per match at the other end.

KuPS has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.7 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: Vardar is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 4 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, KuPS faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If Vardar can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 6.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 66% win probability for KuPS. In practical terms, KuPS would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

While KuPS holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 6.5-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. These two teams met recently in the UEFA Champions League (2026-07-14): Vardar defeated KuPS 2-3. Winning in a high-pressure tournament like this demonstrates Vardar's ability to perform on the biggest stage against KuPS. Notably, Vardar achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against KuPS shows genuine quality and mental strength. The narrow 2-3 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. KuPS will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Vardar will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost. These two teams met recently in the UEFA Champions League (2026-07-07): KuPS defeated Vardar 0-2. Winning in a high-pressure tournament like this demonstrates KuPS's ability to perform on the biggest stage against Vardar. Notably, KuPS achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Vardar shows genuine quality and mental strength. Vardar will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. KuPS will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KuPS

KuPS

VS
Vardar

Vardar

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

KuPS

3W 3D 4L · 12 goals scored · 14 conceded

Vardar

1W 0D 3L · 7 goals scored · 12 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or