Skip to content
Compare Lahti vs TPS

Lahti vs TPS Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Lahti vs TPS: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Lahti Lahti Home Team
TPS TPS Away Team
Lahti
43.5
W D D L L W L D D L

Last 10 Matches

TPS
39.7
L W D L L W L L W D

Performance Radar

Lahti
TPS

Categories Won

6

Lahti

5

Draw

4

TPS

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 4D, 4L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+2

+2

-3

-3

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Tòfol Montiel (2 goals)
A. Muzaci (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

75%

3W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
47.9

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 49.9

47.5

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 49.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.13

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.07

0.94

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.06

Adjusted Power Rating
43.5

Attack: 39.2, Defense: 65.3, Form: 19.6

39.7

Attack: 32.5, Defense: 55.2, Form: 29.2

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

1
3

16-30'

1

31-45'

4

46-60'

4
2

61-75'

76-90+'

4
Lahti
TPS
Lahti

Power Rating Breakdown

43.5

Overall

Attack 39.2
Defense 65.3
Form 19.6
Consistency 64.0
TPS

Power Rating Breakdown

39.7

Overall

Attack 32.5
Defense 55.2
Form 29.2
Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

49.9 vs 49.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Lahti logo Lahti
W
Gnistan (56%)
D
Oulu (54%)
D
TPS (41%)
L
Gnistan (60%)
L
SJK (41%)
W
Ilves (46%)
L
KuPS (67%)
D
VPS (58%)
TPS logo TPS
L
SJK (46%)
W
Jaro (29%)
D
Lahti (48%)
L
KuPS (62%)
L
Ilves (51%)
W
VPS (58%)
L
Inter Turku (61%)
L
Oulu (54%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Gnistan H
1 - 0 W
56%
Oulu A
1 - 1 D
54%
TPS H
0 - 0 D
41%
Gnistan A
0 - 1 L
60%
SJK H
2 - 3 L
41%
Ilves H
5 - 0 W
46%
KuPS A
1 - 2 L
67%
VPS H
1 - 1 D
58%
Mariehamn H
1 - 1 D
22%
HJK A
0 - 1 L
54%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
SJK A
1 - 3 L
46%
Jaro H
3 - 2 W
29%
Lahti A
0 - 0 D
48%
KuPS H
1 - 2 L
62%
Ilves A
0 - 1 L
51%
VPS H
1 - 0 W
58%
Inter Turku A
1 - 2 L
61%
Oulu A
0 - 1 L
54%
HJK H
1 - 0 W
49%
Jaro A
2 - 2 D
34%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 47.9 vs 47.5), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Lahti averaging 1.2 and TPS averaging 1.0 goals per match.

Lahti has the defensive edge, conceding 1.0 per match compared to TPS's 1.3.

Lahti has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

TPS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

The home advantage factor favors TPS, who boasts a 75% home win rate. Playing in front of their fans could be the decisive factor.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.2 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

These two teams drew 0-0 in the Finnish Veikkausliiga (2026-06-23). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Lahti

Lahti

VS
TPS

TPS

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Lahti

2W 4D 4L · 12 goals scored · 10 conceded

TPS

3W 2D 5L · 10 goals scored · 13 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or