Macclesfield vs King's Lynn Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Macclesfield vs King's Lynn: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Macclesfield
Home Team
King's Lynn
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Macclesfield
Draw
King's Lynn
Statistical Comparison
4W, 2D, 4L
2W, 4D, 4L
16 / 10 matches
13 / 10 matches
18 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
-2
-2
0 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
2W / 3 matches
1W / 5 matches
2W / 7 matches
1W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 34.5, Opponent Quality: 45.3
League Difficulty: 30.0, Opponent Quality: 42.1
0W / 1 matches
0W / 1 matches
Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.01
Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.38
Attack: 42.5, Defense: 31.9, Form: 31.9
Attack: 33.2, Defense: 38.4, Form: 15.3
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Macclesfield
King's Lynn
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 29.7 vs 26.7), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.
Macclesfield leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.6 goals per game compared to King's Lynn's 1.3 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
King's Lynn's backline outperforms Macclesfield's, with 1.5 goals conceded per match versus 1.8.
Statistical modeling projects 3.1 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.
❄️ Form Momentum: King's Lynn is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Macclesfield faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.8 goals per match. If King's Lynn can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: Macclesfield's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Macclesfield
King's Lynn
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Macclesfield
4W 2D 4L · 16 goals scored · 18 conceded
King's Lynn
2W 4D 4L · 13 goals scored · 15 conceded
Popular Teams