Skip to content
Compare Mariehamn vs ZW

Mariehamn vs ZW Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Mariehamn vs ZW: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Mariehamn Mariehamn Home Team
ZW ZW Away Team
Mariehamn
23.9
L L L L L L L D D L

Last 10 Matches

ZW
59.7
W W W W W D W L L L

Performance Radar

Mariehamn
ZW

Categories Won

0

Mariehamn

2

Draw

13

ZW

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
0%

0W, 2D, 8L

60%

6W, 1D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
0.3

3 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.2

22 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-19

-19

+6

+6

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
30%

3 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
S. Dahlström (1 goals)
J. Opoku (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 2
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
50.0

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 53.4

54.6

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 49.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.26

Actual: 0.3 | Diff: +0.04

1.84

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.14

Adjusted Power Rating
23.9

Attack: 10.0, Defense: 26.7, Form: 0.0

59.7

Attack: 59.3, Defense: 66.2, Form: 62.8

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1

16-30'

2
1

31-45'

2

46-60'

4
2

61-75'

5

76-90+'

3
Mariehamn
ZW
Mariehamn

Power Rating Breakdown

23.9

Overall

Attack 10.0
Defense 26.7
Form 0.0
Consistency 95.2
ZW

Power Rating Breakdown

59.7

Overall

Attack 59.3
Defense 66.2
Form 62.8
Consistency 43.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 62.4

Opponent Quality

53.4 vs 49.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Mariehamn logo Mariehamn
L
VPS (63%)
L
Inter Turku (56%)
L
HJK (49%)
L
Oulu (54%)
L
Gnistan (56%)
L
HJK (54%)
L
Jaro (34%)
D
KuPS (62%)
ZW logo ZW
W
Dender (32%)
W
Cercle Brugge (51%)
W
La Louvière (38%)
W
La Louvière (42%)
W
Dender (49%)
D
Cercle Brugge (58%)
W
Charleroi (63%)
L
Gent (51%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
VPS A
0 - 4 L
63%
Inter Turku H
0 - 2 L
56%
HJK H
0 - 4 L
49%
Oulu A
1 - 2 L
54%
Gnistan H
0 - 3 L
56%
HJK A
0 - 1 L
54%
Jaro A
0 - 3 L
34%
KuPS H
1 - 1 D
62%
Lahti A
1 - 1 D
48%
VPS H
0 - 1 L
58%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dender H
2 - 1 W
32%
Cercle Brugge A
3 - 2 W
51%
La Louvière H
4 - 0 W
38%
La Louvière A
2 - 0 W
42%
Dender A
2 - 1 W
49%
Cercle Brugge H
2 - 2 D
58%
Charleroi H
1 - 0 W
63%
Gent A
0 - 2 L
51%
Standard H
0 - 1 L
64%
Mechelen A
1 - 2 L
46%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 50.0 vs 54.6), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

ZW's attack is on another level, averaging 1.7 goals per match with J. Opoku leading the charge with 5 goals. Mariehamn manages just 0.3 per match.

Defensively, ZW is far superior, conceding just 1.1 goals per match with 3 clean sheets, while Mariehamn leaks 2.2 per match.

Mariehamn has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

ZW has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

ZW is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Based on our comprehensive analysis including opponent quality adjustment, ZW is the clear and decisive favorite. Their superiority across attack (59.3), defense (66.2), and form (62.8) leaves little room for doubt. Mariehamn will need an exceptional performance to compete.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Mariehamn

Mariehamn

VS
ZW

ZW

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Mariehamn

0W 2D 8L · 3 goals scored · 22 conceded

ZW

6W 1D 3L · 17 goals scored · 11 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or